On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:37 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:17 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> I made a small fix in the doap file - >> https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/pull/15 >> > >> Does the file have to start with YAML - >> https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/blob/eb26085e15759da6b9510c56942b8b232a7a4e11/doap.rdf#L1-L3 >> ? >> The content is a XML but the YAML header bothers me ... >> > > All is good! > https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/blob/asf-site/*content*/doap.rdf > looks OK and https://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ confirms it! > > >> On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 6:08 PM Martijn Dashorst < >> martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> There was some rumblings that a lot of projects don't have a DOAP file >>> (which is processed by https://projects.apache.org) and when I looked at >>> our description on projects.a.o it noted: >>> >>> 6.19.0 (2015-02-02): Latest Stable Release >>> >>> Which is AFAIK incorrect :-D >>> >>> It appears that the DOAP registration points to the SVN repository of our >>> site publishing thing, which hasn't been in use since at last 2 February >>> 2015, 8 years ago. >>> >>> This should be fixed in the projects.a.o administration to point to our >>> DOAP file that's published on the website ( >>> https://wicket.apache.org/doap.rdf), and I think the SCM location should >>> also be changed from subversion to something git like. >>> >> >> Do you know where this change has to be done ? >> > > To answer myself: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data/projects.xml > SVN revision: 1912119 > > >> >> >>> >>> The projects.a.o site: https://projects.apache.org/project.html?wicket >>> >>> Any takers? >>> >>> Martijn >>> >>
