Well, at least I'm not the only one having done the same mistake (not with Wicket and using Cursor) :-)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 10:10 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < [email protected]> wrote: > Thank you so much for clarification! > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 3:00 PM Emond Papegaaij <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Emond... my concern was not regarding quality... I'm 100% sure you > > will > > > double check everything. I was thinking more about authorship. What is > > the > > > Apache Foundation's policy regarding this? Is the code generated by > > Claude > > > open source? Did Claude pass the Apache voting to become a committer > > > somehow? Or is Claude considered a contributor? For sure Claude should > > not > > > be allowed to push to master or any other release branch (as Claude was > > not > > > accepted as a Wicket commiter). Thus, it would be good to know the > Apache > > > Foundation's policy regarding AI-authored code. And who owns the code > > > created by Claude. > > > > > > > Well, in fact they have: > > https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html > > > > You are allowed to use AI to generate code. The rules seem very > > straightforward and very like the code you would write yourself. They do > > recommend to put the markers in, which Claude always does. > > > > The idea is that the code is not created by the AI. It's created by the > > human instructing the AI. Just as we do not attribute the code to the > file > > editor writing it. This does mean you have to put creative effort into > it. > > This goes beyond just a single prompt. You need to make meaningful > changes > > and corrections. As long as you do that, the code is yours (at least that > > where it stands at the moment). > > > > Emond > > > > > -- > Regards - > Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > Apache Wicket Committer > Emerging artist > https://www.instagram.com/reinaldo.barreiro.art/ > -- Andrea Del Bene. Apache Wicket committer.
