Agreed. Master becomes main (version 12), wicket-11.x gets its own branch and the old branches are renamed to archived/wicket-xx.
I also agree with Maxim. We should probably just delete any feature branch that hasn't had any commits in the past 2 years. Emond Op ma 2 nov 2026 om 01:57 schreef Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: > > I would also propose to clean-up at least some of other 80+ branches :) > > from mobile (sorry for typos ;) > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2026, 03:26 Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Let's make a wicket-11.x branch > > > > Also let's move all non-LTS and older branches to: > > > > archived/wicket-6.x > > archived/wicket-7.x > > ... > > > > Probably we should consider renaming master to either main or > > wicket-12.x (my preference would be main, because otherwise we are > > going to keep renaming the default branch) > > > > I'm going to modify the readme for wicket 11 to get a better > > appropriate header, so it matches what is on that branch. > > > > Martijn > >
