> However, as Andreas just pointed out, the annotation is just plain wrong in > this case. It's a PUBLIC method on a PUBLIC class. There is absolutely no > way it should be marked as unused.
Agreed. Tom Jordahl
> However, as Andreas just pointed out, the annotation is just plain wrong in > this case. It's a PUBLIC method on a PUBLIC class. There is absolutely no > way it should be marked as unused.
Agreed. Tom Jordahl