On Monday, June 27, 2011 10:03:56 PM Andreas Veithen wrote:
> Dan,
> 
> Here are the two things on my todo list related to Neethi:
> * NEETHI-9: Can you give your opinion on the question raised in that
> JIRA issue? If we agree on a solution, we can fix that for 3.0.1.

I'm OK throwing an exception.   It's a slight API change if it's a checked 
exception as anything calling the API's would need to catch it.  Thus, I guess 
we'd need to make it an unchecked exception.   


> * Logging: I think the conclusion of the discussion about logging was
> not to use SLF4J, but commons-logging. Therefore we should go be to
> the situation before r1083862. Correct?

No.  I don't think we agreed on anything here.   I'm certainly -1 to commons-
logging at this point, and I assume you are -1 to slf4j.   Thus, I think we'll 
just need to keep it at no logging right now unless you want to stick a very 
small facade in there to go either direction.    If the exceptions are 
properly thrown, I'm not sure we need the logging right now though.

Dan



> 
> Andreas
> 
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 23:28, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:26:20 PM Andreas Veithen wrote:
> >> The Axiom trunk contains a couple of changes that I would like to
> >> release. Just give me a couple of days to prepare the release (let's
> >> say until beginning of next week). I think that I also have a couple
> >> of minor items related to Neethi on my todo list. I'll check.
> > 
> > Cool.  I'm not in a major hurry, but definitely wanted to make sure we
> > can do a release soon.     A week or two is completely fine.    Thanks!
> >   :-)
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> >> Andreas
> >> 
> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 22:52, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > I'd like to do a Neethi 3.0.1 release to grab the patches for the
> >> > few
> >> > bugs we've hit.  However, it now uses an Axiom API that is only
> >> > available in the latest snapshots.  Thus, it would need a new
> >> > Axiom
> >> > release as well.   Is that planned to happen soon?  If not, can I
> >> > roll
> >> > that change back for now?
> >> > 
> >> > Thanks!
> >> > 
> >> > --
> >> > Daniel Kulp
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >> > 
> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > ---
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> 
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > 
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > [email protected]
> > http://dankulp.com/blog
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to