Thanks for all the responses. So to address the open questions: 1) Should streaming-xml-security go into Santuario or WSS4J? Should all of WSS4J move to Santuario?
The consensus seems to be that streaming-xml-security should go into Santuario - and not as a sub-project, and that WSS4J 2.0 should stay where it is. I will initiate a discussion with the Santuario project to see what they think of the idea. 2) Do we require JDK 1.5 support? I propose to just leave this issue for now. Officially we will drop 1.5 support in the development cycle, and possibly revisit nearer the time of the 2.0 release if there are any major objections from downstream projects. 3) Package names. Let's go with something like "org.apache.ws.security.stream". Should we add a "2" in there somewhere to differentiate package names from the 1.6.x releases? Colm. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
