[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Alessio Soldano updated WSS-507:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: proposal.diff

> ThreadLocal based Security Provider proxy
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WSS-507
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-507
>             Project: WSS4J
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: WSS4J Core
>            Reporter: Alessio Soldano
>            Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>             Fix For: 2.0.2
>
>         Attachments: proposal.diff
>
>
> This feature request is about adding a mechanism for making WSS4J (and 
> possibly other projects relying on it) transparently use a Security Provider 
> without globally installing it the JVM. This prevents side effects on other 
> frameworks running within the same JVM and not wanting the BouncyCastle 
> provider currently registered by WSS4J.
> The idea is to register a provider acting as a proxy to a different and 
> thread local scoped provider. The proxied provider reference would have to be 
> set and cleaned up by the WSS4J consumers. The reference being thread local 
> ensures different threads don't have access to it. When no proxied provider 
> is set, the installed provider basically serves no algorithm / service.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ws.apache.org

Reply via email to