[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14105707#comment-14105707
]
Martin Gainty commented on WSS-508:
-----------------------------------
difficult to debug without viewing your code but a previous thread on this
topic suggests if you're OpenSaml libraries are endorsed
decrypter.setRootInNewDocument(true);
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24364686/saml-2-0-decrypting-encryptedassertion-removes-a-namespace-declaration
at the very least we would need to see you XML parser, SAML encrypter, SAML
decrypter jar versions before proceeding ..should be in pom.xml..what exactly
from IBM are you using that Opensource SAML does not OSGI Build? better post
the MANIFEST.MF
> When using "add inclusive prefixes" and EXC C14N - signature cannot be
> validated
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WSS-508
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-508
> Project: WSS4J
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: WSS4J Core
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 2.0.1
> Environment: WAS 7.x, IBM JDK 1.6, WebSphere JAX-WS stack, MS Windows.
> Reporter: Gene B.
> Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Attachments: log 01 - signature verification failed with
> InclusiveNamespaces PrefixList.txt, log 02 - signature verification ok -
> signed by SOAP UI.txt, request1-printedby-provider-signedby-soapui.xml,
> request1-printedby-provider-signedby-wss4j.xml
>
>
> Security implemented using WSS4J securement/validation action approach. We
> are trying to sign the body.
> The provider is a JAX-WS service running on WebSphere JAX-WS stack. Custom
> handler uses WSS4j to validate security.
> The consumer is a WebSphere JAX-WS dispatch client – also attaching custom
> security handler.
> Signature can be validated on the provider side when EXC C14N
> canonicalization is specified with BST compliance flag relaxed. That is
> because when we chose to add “InclusiveNamespaces” “PrefixList” on the
> consumer side, verification fails. When the same test is done with the SOAP
> UI – signature verifies Ok – so I am blaming the consumer – the signing
> process - not verification process.
> I am attaching a log file which shows verification failure when the
> InclusiveNamespaces option is used. If not for this option – this
> verification would’ve been a success.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
