[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14112845#comment-14112845
 ] 

Gene B. commented on WSS-508:
-----------------------------

Marc, that last change you checked in actually did the trick - the issue does 
not appear anymore; and I can visually confirm that the namespaces are 
correctly added to the canonocalized SignedInfo on the consumer side. 

Thank you for looking into this even though it appeared as though the problem 
was with the DOM provider at some point. I'll do a few more tests tomorrow, and 
I will close this issue after everything checks out Ok.

> When using "add inclusive prefixes" and EXC C14N - signature cannot be 
> validated
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WSS-508
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-508
>             Project: WSS4J
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: WSS4J Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 2.0.1
>         Environment: WAS 7.x, IBM JDK 1.6, WebSphere JAX-WS stack, MS Windows.
>            Reporter: Gene B.
>            Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>         Attachments: log 01 - signature verification failed with 
> InclusiveNamespaces PrefixList.txt, log 02 - signature verification ok - 
> signed by SOAP UI.txt, log_03a - consumer - sign message use 
> InclusiveNamespaces prefix list.txt, log_03b - provider - signature 
> verification failed.txt, request1-printedby-provider-signedby-soapui.xml, 
> request1-printedby-provider-signedby-wss4j.xml
>
>
> Security implemented using WSS4J securement/validation action approach. We 
> are trying to sign the body.
> The provider is a JAX-WS service running on WebSphere JAX-WS stack. Custom 
> handler uses WSS4j to validate security. 
> The consumer is a WebSphere JAX-WS dispatch client – also attaching custom 
> security handler.
> Signature can be validated on the provider side when EXC C14N 
> canonicalization is specified with BST compliance flag relaxed. That is 
> because when we chose to add “InclusiveNamespaces” “PrefixList” on the 
> consumer side, verification fails. When the same test is done with the SOAP 
> UI – signature verifies Ok – so I am blaming the consumer – the signing 
> process - not verification process.
> I am attaching a log file which shows verification failure when the 
> InclusiveNamespaces option is used. If not for this option – this 
> verification would’ve been a success.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to