Thanks Colm! Yeah, I already played with those workarounds like pre-registering BC at last slot via java.security or removing BC from the classpath and they all fix the issue. I wasn’t sure if BC is needed for the stuff we rely on which is just signature and basic PKI. The “addJceProviders” route is really not possible in our case because wss4j is used and managed by axis2 1.4/rampart 1.4 and those libraries provides no interface or way to interact with the WSSConfig and wss4j initialization to the service caller. Before posting on this list and made sure I explored this route. So really the 2 options are remove BC and pre-emptively register at higher slot…
Just curious though, is what you say about BS’s dependency for Kerberos support and other things still valid for latter JREs such as 7 & 8? It seems the native crypto support has improved lately. Also I am curious if the 1.6 and 2.x branches still force BC in slot 2 since most of the crypto APIs now let you specify a provider object that would carry the operation… George From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 3:56 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: wss4j-1.5.12 & Bouncy Castle Hi George, The reason that BouncyCastle is inserted in position 2 in the provider list is covered in the JIRA you linked to. BouncyCastle is required for a few things in WSS4J, for example Kerberos decoding support in later versions. If you are using the basic algorithms then it may not be required. Simply try excluding the BouncyCastle jar from your project and see if it works? Failing this, you can set the "addJceProviders" property of WSSConfig to "false", which will turn off adding BouncyCastle. BTW WSS4J 1.5.x is no longer supported. Colm. On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:11 AM, George Stanchev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The relevant code is [2]. At [1] we can see that Colm has chimed in so maybe he can comment on this mess? George [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-99 [2] // // Install the provider after the SUN provider (see WSS-99) // Otherwise fall back to the old behaviour of inserting // the provider in position 2. For AIX, install it after // the IBMJCE provider. // int ret = 0; for (int i = 0; i < provs.length; i++) { if ("SUN".equals(provs[i].getName()) || "IBMJCE".equals(provs[i].getName())) { ret = java.security.Security.insertProviderAt( (java.security.Provider) c.newInstance(), i + 2 ); break; } } if (ret == 0) { ret = java.security.Security.insertProviderAt( (java.security.Provider) c.newInstance(), 2 ); } -----Original Message----- From: George Stanchev [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 4:48 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: wss4j-1.5.12 & Bouncy Castle Hi, I am faced in a peculiar problem that involves multiple moving parts and components. We are using Axis2 1.4.1 which via Rampart 1.4 ends up using wss4j-1.5.2. When this version of wss4j initializes, it registers BC at slot 2 in the javax.security.Security providers list. This initialization done automatically and cannot be bypassed unless BC is registered already at some other spot. The byproduct of all this is the Tomcat's NIO SSL connector either stops working with bcprov 1.5.0 or intermittently stops working for latest bcprov 1.5.2. All this is very complicated, because it has to do with the negotiation of SSL and which protocol and which algorithm suite is being selected. There is definitely an issue with Bouncy Castle's GCMBlockCipher which ends up being used in a TLS1.2 connection b/w Chrome and FF and Tomcat 7.0.61's NIO SSL connector which results in " bad_record_mac ". That's a question for the BC's dev list. What I want to know is why does wss4j-1.5.12 insist on registering BC on slot 2. It's been a while since it has been released and may be those day's JREs didn't have the algorithmic suits needed for SOAP security... If I have to work around this BC issue by pre-registering BC at some other slot so its GCM block cipher doesn't end up being use, which slot is it safe to use? And is it safe to say that wss4j-1.5.12 doesn't really need BC's crypto to do signature, etc... George --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
