[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIOM-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15124425#comment-15124425
]
Hudson commented on AXIOM-282:
------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in axiom-trunk #2458 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/axiom-trunk/2458/])
Increase test coverage to prevent regressions with respect to AXIOM-282.
(veithen: rev 1727660)
*
axiom/testing/axiom-testsuite/src/main/java/org/apache/axiom/ts/soap/SOAPTestSuiteBuilder.java
*
axiom/testing/axiom-testsuite/src/main/java/org/apache/axiom/ts/soap/body/TestGetFirstElementLocalNameWithParserNoLookahead.java
> Get Payload QName information without building OMElement
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIOM-282
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIOM-282
> Project: Axiom
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Rich Scheuerle
> Assignee: Rich Scheuerle
>
> Problem:
> The Axis2 code invokes MessageContext.isFault() before starting the phases.
> This causes an Axiom tree to be built up to and including the
> first child element (payload) in the soap body. The problem is that the
> phases might have special CustomBuilders. Building the Axiom tree past the
> payload
> can defeat these kinds of optimizations.
> Solution1:
> The first solution is tactical and will work with all parsers. The proposal
> is to add some simple, protected "look ahead" code in the StaXOMBuilder.
> The Axiom SOAPBody can use this information to determine whether the payload
> is a fault, without actually building the object. I am working on the
> tests and code for this first solution, and will have it ready in the next
> day or two.
> Solution 2:
> The second solution is support a custom property on the parser. The
> SOAPEnvelope can then call the custom property on the backing parser to get
> the soap body payload qname. The idea is that the parser (woodstox or ibm,
> etc.) may have already looked ahead in the text before the StAX events are
> fully pulled.
> The benefit of this solution is that calls, like MessageContext.isFault(),
> will not cause the expansion of the header elements. I will work on this
> solution
> after solution 1 is done. I don't have a proposed name for the property yet.
> (Note that both of these solutions will require some minor changes to the
> Axis2 code.)
> P.S. I am working with Takahide Nogayama on these changes.
> Thanks,
> Rich Scheuerle
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
