[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Alexandru-Constantin Bledea updated WSS-610:
--------------------------------------------
    Description: 
The decode method from org.apache.wss4j.dom.util.WSSecurityUtil doesn't appear 
to do the right thing when sending NoSecurity.

If we're sending for instance "UsernameToken NoSecurity Signature" we're 
getting back [1]
>From my point of view, it should probably return [1, 0, 2].

However, it seems like the person who wrote that code wanted NoSecurity to 
override any other security policy (just like 
org.apache.ws.security.util.WSSecurityUtil's decodeAction), in that case it 
should probably return just [0], but stopping at what we already parsed up to 
now and not including NoSecurity doesn't seem to be the correct behavior.

  was:
The decode method from WSSecurityUtil doesn't appear to do the right thing when 
sending NoSecurity.

If we're sending for instance "UsernameToken NoSecurity Signature" we're 
getting back [1]
>From my point of view, it should probably return [1, 0, 2].

It seems like the person who wrote that code wanted NoSecurity to override any 
other security policy, in that case it should probably return just [0], but 
stopping at what we already parsed up to now and not including NoSecurity 
doesn't seem to be the correct behavior.


> WSSecurityUtil.decodeAction misbehaving when sending NoSecurity
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WSS-610
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-610
>             Project: WSS4J
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: WSS4J Core
>            Reporter: Alexandru-Constantin Bledea
>            Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> The decode method from org.apache.wss4j.dom.util.WSSecurityUtil doesn't 
> appear to do the right thing when sending NoSecurity.
> If we're sending for instance "UsernameToken NoSecurity Signature" we're 
> getting back [1]
> From my point of view, it should probably return [1, 0, 2].
> However, it seems like the person who wrote that code wanted NoSecurity to 
> override any other security policy (just like 
> org.apache.ws.security.util.WSSecurityUtil's decodeAction), in that case it 
> should probably return just [0], but stopping at what we already parsed up to 
> now and not including NoSecurity doesn't seem to be the correct behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to