Joseph Athman created WSS-642:
---------------------------------
Summary: Use LinkedHashSet instead of TreeSet within
getInclusivePrefixes
Key: WSS-642
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-642
Project: WSS4J
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: WSS4J Core
Affects Versions: 2.2.2
Reporter: Joseph Athman
Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
WSS-626 changed the implementation of the SignatureUtils#getInclusivePrefixes
method to use a Set instead of a List. This change makes sense, however it
changes the order that the prefixes had historically been returned by this
method. A client of ours is having a problem with the new ordering. Although
this is certainly a bug on their end, it seems reasonable to replicate the
previous behavior of this method as closely as possible while still fixing the
bug reported in the issue.
I'd like to suggest using a LinkedHashSet instead of a TreeSet as the Set
implementation in this method. The LHS preserves the insertion order as the
order the elements are returned in. This should make this method behave as
closely as possible prior to the 2.2.2 release of WSS4J.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
