> > 3) Once the code is there from SVN, we’ll need to update all the pom.xml’s > for the new locations and such on each of the active branches. > > When will we have github mirrors that are synced to the new git repos?
Immediately. They are there now. With the new “self serve” repo thing, the gitbox and GitHub mirrors are created within about 20 seconds of submitting the request and everything is wired together automatically. That part is pretty cool. Anyway, the repos are: https://github.com/apache/ws-neethi <https://github.com/apache/ws-neethi> https://github.com/apache/ws-wss4j <https://github.com/apache/ws-wss4j> https://github.com/apache/ws-xmlschema <https://github.com/apache/ws-xmlschema> https://github.com/apache/ws-axiom <https://github.com/apache/ws-axiom> Start pushing changes! (And DON’T commit changes to SVN anymore) Keep in mind, you can push changes to either the GitHub mirror listed above or the repos on gitbox: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#ws <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#ws> > 4) I’m not sure yet what to do with the “parent” stuff or the site stuff. > Thoughts? We could create a “ws-parent” git repo for the parent pom. > > Yes a "ws-parent" repo sounds good to me. I’ll likely handle that on Monday. > > > 5) I’m also not sure how to make the svn stuff read-only. The old process > for doing that no longer applies. Will likely need to file a INFRA ticket > for that, but I do want to make sure the new setup will work OK for everyone. > > Maybe we should consider moving Woden to the attic before doing this (or else > creating a git repo if we want to keep it). @Andreas, what do you think? Well, at this point, I would only mark the 4 “trees” that correspond to the above 4 repos (5 if we add parent) and the rest can remain r/w. Obviously, http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/ <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/> will need to remain r/w until we figure other things out for the website. (Or we just keep the web site as-is) Thus, we can be selective. Dan > > Colm. > > > Dan > > > >> On Oct 18, 2019, at 8:49 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> I’d like to propose to start the process of moving some (or all) of our >> active repos over to git. Since git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> >> died in August, we’ve kind of lost the ability to use git to interact with >> our repositories as the mirrors we had there are gone. What’s worse, the >> GitHub mirror of wss4j is now not getting updated so it doesn’t contain any >> of the latest work there. I’d like to, at least as a start, get Neethi, >> XmlSchema, and WSS4J moved over to git and hosted on gitbox.apache.org >> <http://gitbox.apache.org/> with the full GitHub mirroring and integration >> (pull request, merge buttons, etc…). Would anyone have any objections >> to that? Any other thoughts/concerns? >> >> Would the folks working on Axiom want the Axiom moved over? That >> leaves Woden, but I’m wondering if we just retire/archive that project. 4 >> years since the last release, 2 years since the last commit. >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> - http://dankulp.com/blog >> <http://dankulp.com/blog> >> Talend Community Coder - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/> > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> - http://dankulp.com/blog > <http://dankulp.com/blog> > Talend Community Coder - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/> -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> - http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> Talend Community Coder - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/>
