Sometime back we had a discussion to come up with a convention for creating orbits. So we decided to keep the original artifact id for the bundle as well and append ".wso2" to the original group id. So if we are going to change this convention, we have to change all existing orbits.
Thanks, ~Isuru On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Pradeep Fernando <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently we are giving aritifact-ID, as the name of an orbit bundle. But > the OSGi best practice is to have namespace qualified bundles. If you look > at other orbit projects [1], they are following the above best practice. > > within carbon components, we are using namespace qualified names. So why > not in orbit project. > > > [1] > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/S20120308061416/ > > > --Pradeep > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev > > -- Isuru Suriarachchi Technical Lead WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com email : [email protected] blog : http://isurues.wordpress.com/ lean . enterprise . middleware
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
