On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Asela Pathberiya <[email protected]> wrote: > As Azeez explained , Issue is that the service dispatching does not > happen correctly, because in LB some of the normal normal dispatch > handlers has been removed, Therefore when UI authenticator, calls the > "LoggedUserInfoAdmin" admin service in BE, it goes to _SynapseService. > So AuthenticationHandler treats this as generic service and > any authentication would not be happened.
Understood. Thanks AmilaJ > > Thanks, > Asela. > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Amila Jayasekara <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Kathiravelu Pradeeban >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> For some reason, authentication is failing when you try to login to the >> >> LB. There is no error stacktrace. Only an error message which says that >> > >> > >> > Hi Azeez, >> > How are you trying to log in to the load balancer? Logging into LB >> > through >> > the management console is impossible, since the LB-1.0 times, as all the >> > FE >> > features are removed. >> > >> > I don't think it was possible at all, at any time, and the log in was >> > never >> > tested, as it was not intended to log in to an LB. >> > >> > Do you plan to have some feature that requires a management console or >> > FE, >> > or logging into the load balancer using the BE service calls, for some >> > reason? Otherwise, I think the log in test is inapplicable to LB. >> > >> > Let me know, if we have misunderstood your requirement. >> >> But, if LB is build on top of carbon core, we should be able to login >> to LB (irrespective of the functionality of LB). Let me also >> investigate this. >> >> @Dimuthu, if you have make any progress on this issue, please let me know. >> >> Thanks >> AmilaJ >> >> > >> > Thank you. >> > Regards, >> > Pradeeban. >> > >> >> >> >> the authenticators.xml file is not found, and the default one is used. >> >> >> >> On a related note, that message about using the default >> >> authenticators.xml >> >> file should just be a debug level message. Most frameworks use default >> >> config files, and don't print error messages if a config file is not >> >> explicitly added. >> >> >> >> Can somebody look into this? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Afkham Azeez >> >> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >> >> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ >> >> >> >> email: [email protected] cell: +94 77 3320919 >> >> blog: http://blog.afkham.org >> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez >> >> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez >> >> >> >> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Dev mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Kathiravelu Pradeeban. >> > Software Engineer. >> > Cloud Technologies Team. >> > WSO2 Inc. >> > >> > Blog: [Llovizna] http://kkpradeeban.blogspot.com/ >> > M: +94 776 477 976 >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Mobile : +94773330538 >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev > > -- Mobile : +94773330538 _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
