Hi Ref: https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-11680 already committed.
cheers Dushan On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem < [email protected]> wrote: > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > [email protected] > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient > domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further > information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server > returned was: 550 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does > not exist. Please try > 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or > 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at > 550 5.1.1 > http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6596c14si8612388ann.135 > (state 14). > > ----- Original message ----- > > X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=google.com; s=20120113; > > h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to > :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; > bh=5plU/pQ5v4yiEspcQNKCQHWFKXWrV7hLpSv/nBTfCrI=; > b=Po9Tc/PF+G58VEGbD+4qShHeHkwrI/3erDUWY14GfSapLdVJuLmbOkZq9wjgA/eEp5 > > nk2YLEvVbgu6xmGb0UNC1hKdjDv0fvRNbx79WVOGk6MtpUJrHRvZVLZk7W1ihBAOOWNx > > LTn5emtGykU2+sqZIgK67zDhIvCszJSwk/lH2s2zhvlIBjisD9kwwSmX2zdJpH1PBmH/ > > vkMKvGqurqgMky/rSnxTtOrYZBfiqiBP7sbTPe38Wrhoo730C/dAyo5CFBHWmB2bG8qy > > t3EITMjDZqteETNSAuKwF4tc/sWPpYApSCXxYyHFXZ2eEobBL78JicvboIkoPNAVRTor > pveg== > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Received: by 10.182.72.38 with SMTP id a6mr2930804obv.38.1334646524293; > Tue, > 17 Apr 2012 00:08:44 -0700 (PDT) > Received: by 10.182.58.193 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:08:44 -0700 (PDT) > In-Reply-To: <CAJWskNF4tu75r0Xd6jAKcq= > [email protected]> > References: < > cajwsknegsb2cf1+_9njrpqtppzp94myvtsqjtcgzgoopnt5...@mail.gmail.com> > <capmlfe_dwwwvs9gk-wdazfxzljnqmpevcqbx6e3eq5qussa...@mail.gmail.com > > > <CAJWskNE98gxSM3BP7JguO7eH4BY1Xbn4kjf-AEzM=6ae4et...@mail.gmail.com > > > <capmlfe_qbvgeam0zk_bbvy_6zmhziuormilz-vvamwm0r9c...@mail.gmail.com > > > <CAJWskNH6j=h2kcdbva2kc96ns61_1bes+sbcfxu79mhu1dv...@mail.gmail.com > > > <CACyyj6c4dABXdfN+aoGCE=t8nide96zq-rmw4nt7hednuv0...@mail.gmail.com > > > <CAJWskNF4tu75r0Xd6jAKcq=tkezpo7cxpav694c2hu2-57l...@mail.gmail.com > > > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:38:44 +0530 > Message-ID: <CACyyj6evnuLu6ad1Atfix4jKv=ES8sfys5nb= > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: [New feature request] Support X-Forwarded-For HTTP extension > header in WSO2 LB > From: Dushan Abeyruwan <[email protected]> > To: Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> > Cc: Hiranya Jayathilaka <[email protected]>, stratos-dev < > [email protected]>, > Sadeep Jayasumana <[email protected]> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0447a2a9fb303f04bdda9ba9 > X-Gm-Message-State: > ALoCoQm+qIE2Kqng2gbmefbcCZFZV7JghuMp33MuKz/f/0/UC0cpwFT/jq0zGVPgDNZS1Zb2/KiY > > Hi > Yes, I did this implementation (few months back) and I am not sure whether > it has committed to trunk, will check rite away > > cheers > Dushan > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dushan, > > Has this been implemented in the trunk? > > > > Azeez > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Dushan Abeyruwan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> I will looking to this new feature and will implement ASAP before > next > >> release > >> > >> cheers, > >> Dushan > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Dushan, > >>> Are you on this mailing list? Please ACK. This is something we can & > >>> should get implemented quickly. > >>> > >>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka < > [email protected]>wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Forwarded-For > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In addition, when we log user login requests, we have to pick up > the > >>>>>>> originating IP address using the X-Forwaded-For header, if it is > available. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hiranya and/or Sadeep or someone else from ESB team, can you folks > >>>>>>> please look into this? It should be pretty simple to implement. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We can do this in the configuration without changing any code. Given > >>>>>> that this is only a 'defacto standard', should we do this > programmatically? > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Looks like it will become a standard soon. Most reverse proxies are > >>>>> using this, so there is no harm in us supporting it. It is a simple > HTTP > >>>>> header after all. Extension headers will not cause HTTP servers to > fail or > >>>>> anything like that :) > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> We should still make this configurable. > -- Dushan Abeyruwan *Senior Software Engineer* *Integration Technologies Team* *WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/* *Mobile:(+94)714408632*
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
