And the article from Senaka which serves as the almanac of registry sharing
:) -
http://wso2.org/library/tutorials/2010/04/sharing-registry-space-across-multiple-product-instances

Setting up a cluster of same products is discussed under strategy-B. Again
it speaks of the master-slave model. No mention of LB for UIs.

Thanks,
Hiranya

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka <[email protected]>wrote:

> Charitha has written a good blog post about Carbon clustering model and
> how the synchronizer UI is used in that context -
> http://charithaka.blogspot.com/2011/11/wso2-deployment-synchronizer-sharing.html
>
> This is the use case we have modeled the UI after. UI level LB and the
> possibility of admin requests getting dispatched any of the available nodes
> are not a part of that.
>
> Thanks,
> Hiranya
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some problems.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. org.wso2.carbon.deployment.synchronizer.subversion bundle is
>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>> 2. svnclient bundle is missing
>>>>>>> 3. If you configure once using the UI, all your subsequent changes
>>>>>>> to carbon.xml will be ignored
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right. You should use one way of configuring this feature. We don't
>>>>>> sync configurations from file system to the registry due to the 2-way 
>>>>>> sync
>>>>>> problem.Settings in the registry have priority.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4. UI configurations are stored in local repository. So, if your
>>>>>>> cluster has several nodes, you will have to make changes to all nodes 
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>> by one.\
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's right. This is because within a single cluster some nodes will
>>>>>> be in auto checkout mode and some nodes (usually one) will be in auto
>>>>>> commit mode. We used to store these settings in config registry about a
>>>>>> year ago, but with that we cannot use this component to actually 
>>>>>> configure
>>>>>> a useful clustered setup. That way either everyone will be in auto commit
>>>>>> mode or everyone will be in auto checkout mode. So we moved the settings 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the local repo. It's a per node setting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Which make this configuration useless because, in a proper clustered
>>>>> deployment, we will not be able to control to which node the admin logs 
>>>>> in.
>>>>>
>>>> In addition, in the future, the plan is to have a couple of management
>>>>> nodes, which will have the management console, and then a set of worker
>>>>> nodes. The management nodes are used for configuring the worker cluster.
>>>>> So, if this configuration only gets saved into the local registry of the
>>>>> management node, things won't work as expected.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your argument is valid in case of a cloud deployment. But for a small
>>>> in-house deployment that doesn't make any
>>>>
>>> sense. In an in-house clustered deployment we designate one node as the
>>>> master read-write node.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We are not planning to have one solution for Stratos deployments while
>>> making different recommendations to the customer. In the future, we plan to
>>> promote having management nodes & worker nodes separated, just like we plan
>>> to do in StratosLive.
>>>
>>> Also when a set of nodes is backed by an LB, and all accesses are
>>> through that LB, how do you control to which node the request is forwarded
>>> to, when you are configuring the synchronizer? On the read-write node the
>>> synchronizer has to be configured to commit, while in the read-only node it
>>> has to be configured to update only. How do you do that when the entire
>>> cluster is fronted by an LB?
>>>
>>
>> Azeez, our current clustering model does not say anything about fronting
>> all the UIs from a single LB. We simply ask to setup one node as the master
>> (read-write) and everything else as slaves (read-only). All configuration
>> changes should be performed through the read-write node only. This has been
>> our documented clustering model for enterprise users since Carbon 1.5
>> days (Charitha, correct me if I'm wrong). The deployment sync UI is modeled
>> after that. That makes it easier for someone who's setting up a cluster
>> according to our guidelines, to setup cluster-wide automatic replication of
>> artifacts.
>>
>> Now if we change our clustering model to front all the admin consoles
>> from a single LB then obviously the current UI component won't work. In
>> that scenario I don't think we can use our existing documented master-slave
>> model anymore. So the UI needs to be redesigned for that case.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hiranya
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> That's where admins login and make all the config changes. The
>>>> synchronizer replicates them to other slave (read-only) nodes. This is how
>>>> our enterprise users use this feature. We have documentation explaining the
>>>> process too -
>>>> http://wso2.org/project/esb/java/4.0.3/docs/deployment_guide.html
>>>>
>>>> In case of a Stratos, we don't ship the UI component. It's not made to
>>>> be used in a scenario like that.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Hiranya
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Hiranya
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>> Has anybody tested this with the new packs?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> *Afkham Azeez*
>>>>>>>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>>>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>>>>>>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>**
>>>>>>>> email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919
>>>>>>>> blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>*
>>>>>>>> twitter: 
>>>>>>>> **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Afkham Azeez*
>>>>>>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>>>>>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>**
>>>>>>> email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919
>>>>>>> blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>*
>>>>>>> twitter: 
>>>>>>> **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Dev mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Hiranya Jayathilaka
>>>>>> Associate Technical Lead;
>>>>>> WSO2 Inc.;  http://wso2.org
>>>>>> E-mail: [email protected];  Mobile: +94 77 633 3491
>>>>>> Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Afkham Azeez*
>>>>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>>>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>**
>>>>> email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919
>>>>> blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>*
>>>>> twitter: 
>>>>> **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
>>>>> *
>>>>> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
>>>>> *
>>>>> *
>>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hiranya Jayathilaka
>>>> Associate Technical Lead;
>>>> WSO2 Inc.;  http://wso2.org
>>>> E-mail: [email protected];  Mobile: +94 77 633 3491
>>>> Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Afkham Azeez*
>>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>**
>>> email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919
>>> blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>*
>>> twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
>>> *
>>> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
>>> *
>>> *
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Hiranya Jayathilaka
>> Associate Technical Lead;
>> WSO2 Inc.;  http://wso2.org
>> E-mail: [email protected];  Mobile: +94 77 633 3491
>> Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Hiranya Jayathilaka
> Associate Technical Lead;
> WSO2 Inc.;  http://wso2.org
> E-mail: [email protected];  Mobile: +94 77 633 3491
> Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com
>



-- 
Hiranya Jayathilaka
Associate Technical Lead;
WSO2 Inc.;  http://wso2.org
E-mail: [email protected];  Mobile: +94 77 633 3491
Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to