Hi Azeez, I don't think there should be a reason as to why you can't obtain this. See [1] for example.
However, though this was allowed through the SuperTenantCarbonContext there are (or might have been) some security checks that disallowed tenant code from getting hold of this. AmilaJ might know about the latest state of that. But, according to my understanding that's a separate issue from what Supun is asking here. Am I missing something? [1] http://wso2.org/svn/browse/wso2/trunk/carbon/core/org.wso2.carbon.application.deployer/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/application/deployer/persistence/CarbonAppPersistenceManager.java?view=markup Thanks, Senaka. On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: > Senaka, > I think the question is, is there some rationale behind not giving the > tenant a local registry instance. Did we conclude that it does not make > sense for a tenant to have a local registry. Can you remember anything > related to this? > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Supun, >> >> CarbonContext will not just give you what you want. Somebody needs to >> first populate that with what it can return back. Now you can go have a >> look on who populates these fields, and you should be able to find the >> cause for this being null. >> >> Thanks, >> Senaka. >> >> >> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Supun Malinga <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Senaka, >>> >>> Any idea on this? >>> I do get valid objects when I query for config reg., gov. reg. in same >>> method. >>> eg:* >>> *SuperTenantCarbonContext.getCurrentContext(axisConfig).getRegistry(RegistryType.USER_GOVERNANCE) >>> works fine. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Supun Malinga <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>> How to do $subject using axisConfig. ? >>>> I tried, >>>> * >>>> SuperTenantCarbonContext.getCurrentContext(axisConfig).getRegistry(RegistryType.LOCAL_REPOSITORY) >>>> * >>>> but this always return null for tenants other than super tenant. >>>> >>>> Whats the correct and accurate way to handle this.? >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> -- >>>> Supun Malinga, >>>> >>>> Software Engineer, >>>> WSO2 Inc. >>>> http://wso2.com >>>> http://wso2.org >>>> email - [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>> mobile - 071 56 91 321 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Supun Malinga, >>> >>> Software Engineer, >>> WSO2 Inc. >>> http://wso2.com >>> http://wso2.org >>> email - [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> mobile - 071 56 91 321 >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Senaka Fernando* >> Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry; >> Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com* >> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org >> >> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com >> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818 >> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando >> >> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >> >> > > > -- > *Afkham Azeez* > Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ > * <http://www.apache.org/>** > email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919 > blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* > twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> > * > linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* > > * > * > *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware* > > -- *Senaka Fernando* Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee; Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com* Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
