Hi Ruchira, No we don't support relative paths. As we always understood, it is always possible to normalize the relative path into a full-path, since you are in fact specifying the full-path in the RXT. For example, in this case, it would be /providers/provider.xml (if providers reside inside /_system/governance. I don't think there is a use-case for supporting this.
Thanks, Senaka. On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Ruchira, > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Ruchira Wageesha <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Is there a particular reason for $subject? If we allow it, then automatic >> association creation would be more useful. i.e. we can specify paths like, >> >> <association type="uses" >> target="@{overview_provider}/../../providers/provider.xml"/> >> > > AFAIK, target or source which can be specialized here should be a complete > path. So there won't be any calculation when adding the association. That's > why these are not allowed. > For me its a good to have one, but what is the actual use case of this > improvement? > > thanks > Eranda > > * > * > > -- *Senaka Fernando* Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee; Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com* Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
