Hi Chethiya, I read through the JIRA issue. It seems to be a constructed edge-case scenario. There are pros and cons for both #1 and #2. Also, Endpoint and WSDL are not coupled. At least in our ESB, we have adopted such an approach.
Thanks, Senaka. On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Chethiya Abeysinghe <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi all, > > Trying to find a resolution for the jira [1]. There are two options we see > in here. Please comment to figure out what's the expected behaviour. > > 1. Delete endpoints when deleting the respective WSDL of it. > > If the user wants to delete a WSDL file, that implies no point of keeping > endpoints. i.e. If user wants to keep an Endpoint, user will not delete > respective WSDL file. We assume an endpoint can't be shared between > multiple WSDLs. > > 2. Keep it the way it is now. That is, if a WSDL is deleted, respective > Endpoints are persisted with their environments status too (Dev, Test, > Stag, Prod, etc) > > [1] - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-1350 > > Thanks > -- > Chethiya Abeysinghe > Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com/ > > > -- *Senaka Fernando* Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee; Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com* Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
