On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Nuwan,
>
> Reviews are not done offline, :). Ragu will post details of the review
> once we are ready and please do join so that we can validate this API
> against the UES use-cases.
>

will do.


>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Nuwan Bandara <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> If we are doing this, we will have to do it in a generic manner, so that
>> later on other platform APIs also can be exposed in the same manner. For an
>> example, wight now if we extend the AbstractAdmin, in any of our admin
>> service we are sure that the service is secured over basic OAuth. similar
>> manner this has to be done IMO.
>>
>> I would like to join any reviews/discussions, if anything is happening
>> offline
>>
>> Regards,
>> /Nuwan
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi Ragu,
>>>
>>> OAuth is not strictly a part of IS according to my understanding. It is
>>> a reusable component in our platform, and we should be able to make use of
>>> it without much of a hassle.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Sriragu Arudsothy <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hai Senaka,
>>>>
>>>>                  OAuth not yet implemented. I will do that first. I
>>>> think OAuth is mainly implemented in IS. I think I have to implement the
>>>> integration part of the OAuth to the rest api. Please tell me your ideas
>>>> how can I approach this situation?
>>>>
>>>> What else I need to be considered when implement this?
>>>>
>>>> Ragu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ragu,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is OAuth based security implemented for this? If not, lets do that
>>>>> first. Once done, lets have a review of the design and the code. Next step
>>>>> would be to document the entire API and provide some sample(s) explaining
>>>>> how this can be used.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Senaka.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Sriragu Arudsothy 
>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hai All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           The REST API currently implemented as a web - application.
>>>>>> The web application get an remote registry instance to access the 
>>>>>> registry
>>>>>> components. The current implementation does the necessary resource 
>>>>>> related
>>>>>> operations  using the instance of the remote registry. eg( adding
>>>>>> comments/rating/tags ..etc on the resource).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After I had the offline chat with G-Reg team, we now plan to move the
>>>>>> REST api into the platform/registry components as a separate OSGI 
>>>>>> bundle. I
>>>>>> did the necessary changes to the current app and moved to the above
>>>>>> location and checked whether the REST api bundle is active/enabled when 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> G-Reg instance is started. Yes, it was enabled.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to know your opinion on how the REST API implementation
>>>>>> need to be adapted to G-Reg. or How Do I need to implement this REST API 
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> means some other products also can access?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Sriragu
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> * <http://wso2con.com/>
>>>>> *
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>> Senaka Fernando*
>>>>> Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee;
>>>>> Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>>>
>>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> * <http://wso2con.com/>
>>> *
>>> *
>>>
>>> Senaka Fernando*
>>> Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee;
>>> Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>
>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> Nuwan Bandara
>> Associate Technical Lead & Member, MC, Development Technologies
>> WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware |  http://wso2.com
>> blog : http://nuwanbando.com; email: [email protected]; phone: +94 11 763
>> 9629
>> *
>> <http://www.nuwanbando.com/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> * <http://wso2con.com/>
> *
> *
>
> Senaka Fernando*
> Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee;
> Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com*
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>
> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
> **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818
> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>



-- 
*Thanks & Regards,

Nuwan Bandara
Associate Technical Lead & Member, MC, Development Technologies
WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware |  http://wso2.com
blog : http://nuwanbando.com; email: [email protected]; phone: +94 11 763 9629
*
<http://www.nuwanbando.com/>
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to