On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:
> Folks, > I am starting a new thread to see how everybody feels about using JSON > syntax for the config files wer are using. I personally feel that it looks > elegant, and very easy to edit with vi. Also, we don't do any schema > validation of our config files, and the config file structures are simple, > so JSON could be more appropriate. > > Thoughts? > I'm -0 on this change. Other than user friendliness do we have any significant customer related issue to fix by changing configuration files into JSON ? If not we should target to solve significant C4 issues first. As some people mentioned this needs great amount of documentation and migration tools, I don't believe it's a good idea to do this at the beginning of C5. Thanks ! > > -- > *Afkham Azeez* > Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ > * <http://www.apache.org/>** > email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919 > blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* > twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> > * > linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* > * > * > *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware* > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > > -- Sagara Gunathunga Technical Lead; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com V.P Apache Web Services ; http://ws.apache.org/ Blog ; http://ssagara.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
