+1 transports has nothing to do with kernel

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Amila Suriarachchi <[email protected]> wrote:

> is there any reason to shift transports with the kernel?
>
> I think there is not reason and projects like GReg does not require them
> as well. So shall we remove transports from carbon kernel 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT.
>
> thanks,
> Amila.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Miyuru Wanninayaka <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We are working on JMS map message support in next ESB release. JMS
>> transport is resides in kernel, so either we have to release a new kernel
>> version with ESB 4.7.0 or wait for kernel 4.2.0 ( Mid May? )to release ESB
>> 4.7.0
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> --
>> Miyuru Wanninayaka
>> Senior Software Engineer - WSO2 Inc
>> +94-772099788
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Amila Suriarachchi*
>
> Software Architect
> WSO2 Inc. ; http://wso2.com
> lean . enterprise . middleware
>
> phone : +94 71 3082805
>



-- 
Miyuru Wanninayaka
Senior Software Engineer - WSO2 Inc
+94-772099788
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to