On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Amila Suriarachchi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>> yes. Still a platform version would be enough to derive the kernel >>> version. However first we need to identify the real advantage of starting >>> these jar versions from 1.0.0. >>> >> >> I thought it was obvious. If you start developing a brand new feature, >> and decide to ship it as an alpha preview for example, it does not make >> sense to name that feature & component with 4.2.0. New components should >> start life at 1.0.0. >> > > I think the question is do we release alpha version of products or > components? > > It would be nice to start with 1.0.0, what I am thinking is whether is it > really matters. > > Yes we do. Sometimes we ship features which are very new in a mature product, and we market them or position them as early previews. Regardless of that, the component itself has its own lifecycle and it is wrong to start versioning at 4.x, 5.x etc. > thanks, > Amila. > > > > -- > *Amila Suriarachchi* > > Software Architect > WSO2 Inc. ; http://wso2.com > lean . enterprise . middleware > > phone : +94 71 3082805 > -- *Afkham Azeez* Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ * <http://www.apache.org/>** email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919 blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* * * *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
