+1. We came across the same observation during our recent refactoring efforts. This will eliminate registry specific user.APIs as well...( I think they had their own userRealm with some additional methods)
--Pradeep sent from my phone On Jul 14, 2013 3:25 PM, "Prabath Siriwardena" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Prabath Siriwardena <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> $subject >>> >>> Ideally it should be on user.api. Due to this - we still need to keep an >>> extended interface inside user.core. >>> >>> Or else shall we fix this in registry.core to refer user.api ? >>> >> >> Would be better if Registry core can depend only on the user API >> > > +1. Since we are doing major refactoring - its better to do it cleanly. > Did the changes - will commit to a temp svn location.. > > Thanks & regards, > -Prabath > > > >> >> >>> >>> Thanks & Regards, >>> Prabath >>> >>> Mobile : +94 71 809 6732 >>> >>> http://blog.facilelogin.com >>> http://RampartFAQ.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Afkham Azeez* >> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ >> * <http://www.apache.org/>** >> email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919 >> blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* >> twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> >> * >> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* >> * >> * >> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware* >> > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Prabath > > Mobile : +94 71 809 6732 > > http://blog.facilelogin.com > http://RampartFAQ.com > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev > >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
