On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Shariq Muhammed <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Nuwan Dias <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Shariq Muhammed <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Lalaji Sureshika <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> $Is Subject available? >>>> The requirement for asking above property is,though each carbon server >>>> supports multi-tenancy,there will be instances where a carbon server is >>>> running in Super Tenant mode only [without adding multi-tenanted users..]. >>>> We are checking whether a property available to differentiate the above >>>> two deployments. >>>> >>> >>> There is no such property, the idea is that all features should be >>> implemented so that MT is supported inherently, so we opted against such a >>> property. Also whats the use case for having much a property ?! >>> >>> Currently when you access the Store in API Manager (/store) it will >>> display all public APIs belonging to all tenants. This is done by iterating >>> through all tenant registries. Since this has a heavy performance overhead, >>> it was decided to show only the URLs of the Stores (/store?tenant= >>> foo.com) of all tenants on the Store UI. >>> >> > Um I might be missing something here, but I don't think its a good idea to > display other tenant domain's in the URL or UI. Tenant domain / id are > sensitive info and in real world and might impact tenant isolation, we had > a similar discussion a while back iirc, but in AM since we display > publisher (tenant) info, this might not be the case. > Shariq, This has already been discussed on architecture in http://markmail.org/message/wc7gb67j7rwdsk76. > > >> In the case of having the API Manager running in super-tenant mode only, >> the Store needs to be shown as it is now. Therefore to populate the Store >> accordingly, we need to know whether the API Manager is running in MT mode >> or not. Hence the need of such a parameter. >> > > If this is an absolute necessity you might have to introduce a property > for AM, better discuss with Azeez et al before doing so ... > It's not an necessity. We just wanted to check if there is property to check if a product is running in MT mode or not. Seems to be a fairly generic requirement. > > >> >> Thanks, >> NuwanD. >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks; >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Lalaji Sureshika >>>> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com/ >>>> email: [email protected]; >>>> blog: http://lalajisureshika.blogspot.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Shariq. >>> Phone: +94 777 202 225 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Nuwan Dias >> >> Senior Software Engineer - WSO2, Inc. http://wso2.com >> email : [email protected] >> Phone : +94 777 775 729 >> > > > > -- > Thanks, > Shariq. > Phone: +94 777 202 225 > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev > > -- /sumedha m: +94 773017743 b : bit.ly/sumedha
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
