Noted.

- Evanthika


On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Pradeep Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:

> @QA,
>
> Please patch the QA setup with following jar and proceed with tenant level
> depsync.
>
> thanks,
> --Pradeep
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Pradeep Fernando <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kasun and me looked in to the issue.
>> The issue has surfaced due to Erandas commit to,
>> SynchronizeRepositoryRequest#execute() method - setting tenant info to
>> CC. However, it is the correct approach IMHO.
>> In the current implementation the cluster message listener always passes
>> mainConfigContext to the execute() method. Hence during the doDeployment()
>> method call, the super-tenant CarbonAxisConfigurator get picked instead of
>> TenantAxisConfigurator.
>>
>> thought of handling the multi-tenant aspects after message being passed
>> to the receiving side. (after the execute method)
>>
>> Therefor modified the doDeployment method as follows,
>>
>>  if (!MultitenantConstants.SUPER_TENANT_DOMAIN_NAME.equals(tenantDomain))
>> {
>>             // If the depsync request is for tenant repository..
>>             configContext =
>> TenantAxisUtils.getTenantConfigurationContext(tenantDomain, configContext);
>>         }
>>         AxisConfigurator axisConfigurator =
>> configContext.getAxisConfiguration().getConfigurator();
>>         if (axisConfigurator instanceof CarbonAxisConfigurator) {
>>             ((CarbonAxisConfigurator) axisConfigurator).runDeployment();
>>         } else if (axisConfigurator instanceof TenantAxisConfigurator) {
>>             ((TenantAxisConfigurator) axisConfigurator).runDeployment();
>>         }
>>
>>
>> The functionality is working fine for me in my local setup. Please let me
>> know if you find any issues with the above approach..
>>
>> thanks,
>> --Pradeep
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Pradeep Fernando <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> i will have a look..
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The second issue seems to be because of a local issue when configuring
>>>> the wka clustering. I'm trying to re-produce the first issue.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> KasunG
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Tenant Deployment Synchronizing is broken in latest packs. This issue
>>>>> is of two fold.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Tenants fail to update their svn repository when a cluster message
>>>>> is received. [1] The actual issue is that although the cluster message,
>>>>> SynchronizeRepositoryRequest, has the correct tenant id, the
>>>>> ConfigurationContext object passed by worker node is the CC of super
>>>>> tenant. The cluster message receiver node is supposed to pass the correct
>>>>> ConfigurationContext to SynchronizeRepositoryRequest#execute method. It
>>>>> seems like the HazelcastClusteringAgent is not tenant aware.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Manager nodes fails to send cluster message  -  The reason is
>>>>> that ClusteringAgent that is used to send the cluster message is null.
>>>>> Noticed this in local setup even for super-tenant. Seems to be 
>>>>> intermittent
>>>>> since this is apparently working in the 9thAug QA setup.
>>>>>
>>>>> CarbonDeploymentSchedulerTask#sendRepositorySyncMessage
>>>>> CarbonCoreDataHolder.getInstance().getMainServerConfigContext().
>>>>>                         getAxisConfiguration().getClusteringAgent();
>>>>> ==> null
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-14346
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> KasunG
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Kasun Gajasinghe*
>>>>> Software Engineer;
>>>>> Development Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  ,
>>>>> *email: **kasung AT spamfree wso2.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ** cell: **+94 (77) 678-0813*
>>>>> *linked-in: *http://lk.linkedin.com/in/gajasinghe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> *
>>>>> *blog: **http://kasunbg.org* <http://kasunbg.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Kasun Gajasinghe*
>>>> Software Engineer;
>>>> Development Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ,
>>>> *email: **kasung AT spamfree wso2.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ** cell: **+94 (77) 678-0813*
>>>> *linked-in: *http://lk.linkedin.com/in/gajasinghe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> *
>>>> *blog: **http://kasunbg.org* <http://kasunbg.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Pradeep Fernando*
>>> Associate Technical Lead;WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>
>>> blog: http://pradeepfernando.blogspot.com
>>> m: +94776603662
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Pradeep Fernando*
>> Associate Technical Lead;WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>
>> blog: http://pradeepfernando.blogspot.com
>> m: +94776603662
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Pradeep Fernando*
> Associate Technical Lead;WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>
> blog: http://pradeepfernando.blogspot.com
> m: +94776603662
>
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to