I know this is a somewhat serious claim and I'll be more than happy, if someone can prove me wrong :)
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Nirmal Fernando <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I expected them to be mutually exclusive in the sense one change done by > one execution plan, should not affect any other execution plan (If they are > not intentionally doing that - eg: acting based on a stream, updated by one > execution plan is an example for intentionally having some correlation). > > In my scenario, I have two execution plans and both are using the same > input stream with different aliases (eg: inputstream as A and inputStream > as B). In one of my execution plans, I've added some data that is not > compliance with original input stream definition (add a double instead of > int) and I happened to see that my other execution plan get triggered and > started to parse this malformed stream and failed (query has avg operation, > and since AvgOutputAggregator is expecting an integer but receiving a > double). > > > -- > > Thanks & regards, > Nirmal > > Senior Software Engineer- Platform Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc. > Mobile: +94715779733 > Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ > > -- Thanks & regards, Nirmal Senior Software Engineer- Platform Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc. Mobile: +94715779733 Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
