Hi Amal,

It would be better if you can send detailed architecture to mailing list so
that it will get wider attention and more comments.

Thanks !

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:

> Amal is creating a generic component which will expose a CacheInvalidator
> OSGi service. This service takes care of publishing to the cache
> invalidation topic. GReg & UM code would be the consumers of this service.
> The general caching code will not be aware of this implementation.
>
> Azeez
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Azeez,
>>
>> AFAIU, this has to be implemented at some central code, since this has to
>> happen for both the UM and the registry caches at the same time. Therefore,
>> this is not just a G-Reg only fix.
>>
>> Hi Sagara,
>>
>> Yes, this approach looks good.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Sagara Gunathunga <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Azeez/Senaka,
>>>
>>> There are few aspects related to cache invalidation here.
>>>
>>> 1.) Time out based cache invalidation - ( Right now it's broken for GReg
>>> but we will fix it and let's leave it)
>>>
>>> 2.)  Cache invalidation across the platform - This is where we bring
>>> this pub-sub based approach.  The overhead of this approach is it requires
>>> a broker, but given the fact that this should smoothly work across whole
>>> stack users can decide whether to satisfy with  1.) or bring a broker so
>>> not a problem.
>>>
>>> 3.) Cache invalidation across the GReg cluster - Today this is supported
>>> and not a problem according to the cluster architecture as well.
>>>
>>> So how we going to support this option 3.)  ?
>>>
>>> a.) If a broker is already available in the architecture then are we
>>> delegate cache invalidation among Greg node also to the broker ?
>>>
>>> b.) In case there is no broker available still users should able to
>>> invalidate cache among Greg nodes in that case we could keep existing
>>> cluster based mechanism too. IMO it's hard to expect to bring a new broker
>>> component just do the cache invalidation with same cluster and some may can
>>> consider it as story broken for cache.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Personally I'm thinking about following architecture.
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. We keep existing cluster based cache invalidation as it is but not
>>> recommend to use it among different product clusters.
>>>
>>> 2. Enable pub-sub model only to communicate cache invalidation messages
>>> among clusters not among each individual node.
>>>
>>> 3. Cluster representative  - There is a kind of an agent or one member
>>> from each cluster can subscribe with broker and this guy can
>>> publish/receive messages in behalf of his cluster.
>>>
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Amal Gunatilake <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Azeez/Senaka,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have implemented the JMS publisher and receiver as a separate
>>>>> component. These interfaces will register a topic in the ActiveMQ server
>>>>> and each cluster node can subscribe to the topic. Once GReg cluster 
>>>>> publish
>>>>> the message to the topic the subscribers will receive the message.
>>>>>
>>>>> In-order to implement the next step which is passing and updating the
>>>>> correct data, I need to know the following.
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. Which section of the code I need to focus in Kernel where cache
>>>>>    invalidation happens in GReg (Hazelcast Cache add, delete, update)?
>>>>>
>>>>> In GReg, wherever relevant resources are updated, and cache needs to
>>>> be globally (across multiple clusters) invalidated, your OSGi service
>>>> should get called. Let's call that service GlobalCacheInivalidationService
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    1.
>>>>>    2. Which section of the code I need to focus in Kernel where
>>>>>    individual nodes get update in a cluster with Hazelcast?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> In the kernel, we just need to add the patch which implements the
>>>> coordinator functionality. We don't need to change any other code or the
>>>> caching implementation
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you  & Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> *Amal Gunatilake*
>>>>>  Software Engineer
>>>>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>> lean.enterprise.middleware
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Afkham Azeez*
>>>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
>>>> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>
>>>> * cell: +94 77 3320919 <%2B94%2077%203320919> blog: *
>>>> *http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>
>>>> *twitter: 
>>>> **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
>>>> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>*
>>>>
>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sagara Gunathunga
>>>
>>> Senior Technical Lead; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com
>>> V.P Apache Web Services;    http://ws.apache.org/
>>> Linkedin; http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
>>> Blog ;  http://ssagara.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> *[image: http://wso2.com] <http://wso2.com> Senaka Fernando*
>> Senior Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>
>>
>>
>> * Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>> <http://apache.org>E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com <http://wso2.com>**P: +1
>> 408 754 7388 <%2B1%20408%20754%207388>; ext: 51736*;
>>
>>
>> *M: +94 77 322 1818 <%2B94%2077%20322%201818> Linked-In:
>> http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>> <http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando>*
>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Afkham Azeez*
> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>
> * cell: +94 77 3320919 <%2B94%2077%203320919> blog: *
> *http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>
> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>*
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>



-- 
Sagara Gunathunga

Senior Technical Lead; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com
V.P Apache Web Services;    http://ws.apache.org/
Linkedin; http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
Blog ;  http://ssagara.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to