Hi, +1 for skipping license through config.
Thanks, Best Regards, Lakshitha Harshan Software Engineer Mobile: *+94724423048* Email: [email protected] Blog : http://harshanliyanage.blogspot.com/ *WSO2, Inc. :** wso2.com <http://wso2.com/>* lean.enterprise.middleware. On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Dilshan Edirisuriya <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > I believe license itself needs to be there for BYOD devices unless tenant > admin wants to skip that through a configuration and disable it for entire > tenant itself. What is the purpose of having the license if it can be > skipped? That means BYOD devices can register without it and violate the > company policies? > > Regards, > > Dilshan > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Harshan Liyanage <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Chan, >> >> It's not about showing the license for all users. This is about bypassing >> the license screen by* choosing bypass option* if the user wants to do >> so. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Lakshitha Harshan >> Software Engineer >> Mobile: *+94724423048* >> Email: [email protected] >> Blog : http://harshanliyanage.blogspot.com/ >> *WSO2, Inc. :** wso2.com <http://wso2.com/>* >> lean.enterprise.middleware. >> >> >> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Chan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 for changing the text of fields for usability. A small concern on >>> Kasun's comment about License agreement - I thought we all agreed that >>> there is no license agreement for COPE devices. Did this change? >>> >>> Cheers~ >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Harshan Liyanage <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Please find my comments inline. >>>> >>>> 1. How do the user know the format to type in the domain. What if he >>>> type "http://abc.com"? I think we should guide him in the screen as it >>>> was before. And the title "MDM Server" does not sound right to me because >>>> we all agreed on the single name "EMM" and why do we deviate from that in >>>> Agent? >>>> >>>> I think we should guide the user as before. >>>> >>>> 2. +1 for this change, but still I feel "Domain" sounds clear than >>>> "Group". >>>> >>>> I think we should add a help screen to let the users to know what is >>>> meant by these fields (domain/group). So then there won't be any >>>> clarification issues. >>>> >>>> 2. -1 for this change. I think all the users should see the license >>>> agreement. Otherwise this can be an issue later (Ex:If his/her phone get >>>> wipes off for some reason, he might complain about it negatively). I don't >>>> see any complication in showing the agreement because they can simply >>>> accept it and go ahead if they want. I think showing the agreement is >>>> anyways better and safe in legal aspects as well. So I strongly -1 on this >>>> change. >>>> >>>> I also agree with Kasun. Users must know what the EMM client app is >>>> capable of. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> Lakshitha Harshan >>>> Software Engineer >>>> Mobile: *+94724423048* >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> Blog : http://harshanliyanage.blogspot.com/ >>>> *WSO2, Inc. :** wso2.com <http://wso2.com/>* >>>> lean.enterprise.middleware. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Kasun Dananjaya Delgolla < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Krishanthi, >>>>> >>>>> Please find my comments on above options. >>>>> >>>>> 1. How do the user know the format to type in the domain. What if he >>>>> type "http://abc.com"? I think we should guide him in the screen as >>>>> it was before. And the title "MDM Server" does not sound right to me >>>>> because we all agreed on the single name "EMM" and why do we deviate from >>>>> that in Agent? >>>>> >>>>> 2. +1 for this change, but still I feel "Domain" sounds clear than >>>>> "Group". >>>>> >>>>> Here are my comments on Improvements section: >>>>> >>>>> 1. +1 for this, these information should be sent be the server >>>>> probably in SENDER_ID request and then we can show/bypass pin setting. >>>>> >>>>> 2. -1 for this change. I think all the users should see the license >>>>> agreement. Otherwise this can be an issue later (Ex:If his/her phone get >>>>> wipes off for some reason, he might complain about it negatively). I don't >>>>> see any complication in showing the agreement because they can simply >>>>> accept it and go ahead if they want. I think showing the agreement is >>>>> anyways better and safe in legal aspects as well. So I strongly -1 on this >>>>> change. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Krishanthi Samarasinghe < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Shan, >>>>>> >>>>>> As we discussed, we are going to do following changes: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Change the message in setting server IP screen. >>>>>> Change from *Set your server address here to start registration, i.e >>>>>> : www.abc.com <http://www.abc.com>"* to "*Set your MDM server >>>>>> address"* >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. In login screen, currently we have inputs as following order: >>>>>> i. Domain >>>>>> ii. Username >>>>>> iii Password >>>>>> >>>>>> We are going to change it as: >>>>>> i. Username >>>>>> ii. Password >>>>>> iii. Group (We are using this for tenancy) >>>>>> >>>>>> *Note:* Here I have attached the server IP screen(setServerIP.png) >>>>>> and the login screen(login.png). >>>>>> >>>>>> *Improvements:* >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. We should allow to add pin code, only for users who is able to >>>>>> wipe the device. For that we(Android agent) need to get that information >>>>>> from the server side *after the login*, but *before completing the >>>>>> registration*. Then there will be changes in both server side and >>>>>> android agent. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. We should allow user to do the registration even *without seeing >>>>>> license agreement* if *he/she requires*. There cannot be any screen >>>>>> between the registration and registration successful screens. For that we >>>>>> need to include a check box. We need to decide the screen where we have >>>>>> to >>>>>> add this. >>>>>> >>>>>> If we are going to implement this, since there are many logical >>>>>> implementation based on the license agreement in Android Agent, we have >>>>>> to >>>>>> do a major change in Android Agent. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know, if I have missed any point. >>>>>> >>>>>> Others opinions are welcome. Please give your comments to proceed on >>>>>> this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>> Krishanthi Bhagya Samarasinghe >>>>>> Senior Software engineer >>>>>> >>>>>> Mobile: +94 716028280 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Kasun Dananjaya Delgolla >>>>> >>>>> Software Engineer >>>>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >>>>> lean.enterprise.middleware >>>>> Tel: +94 11 214 5345 >>>>> Fax: +94 11 2145300 >>>>> Mob: + 94 777 997 850 >>>>> Blog: http://kddcodingparadise.blogspot.com >>>>> Linkedin: *http://lk.linkedin.com/in/kasundananjaya >>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/kasundananjaya>* >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Chan (Dulitha Wijewantha) >>> Software Engineer - Mobile Development >>> WSO2Mobile >>> Lean.Enterprise.Mobileware >>> * ~Email [email protected] <[email protected]>* >>> * ~Mobile +94712112165 <%2B94712112165>* >>> * ~Website dulitha.me <http://dulitha.me>* >>> * ~Twitter @dulitharw <https://twitter.com/dulitharw>* >>> *~Github @dulichan <https://github.com/dulichan>* >>> *~SO @chan <http://stackoverflow.com/users/813471/chan>* >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dilshan Edirisuriya > Senior Software Engineer - WSO2 > Mob: + 94 777878905 > http://wso2.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
