Hi Chathura, Thanks for the comments. Once all the todo stuff completes during next week, let's have call with Cyril.
Thank you & Best regards, *Amal Gunatilake* Software Engineer WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com lean.enterprise.middleware On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Chathura Ekanayake <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Amal, > > I had a chat with Cyril at WSO2Con and he is willing to give feedback on > our operational BPMN UI. Below are some initial comments from Cyril, which > were given in a previous email: > > - only people that can launch (have the right Role) processes can see the > starting UI or even the complete definition > - plain Actors can only see their tasks (You can also have the tasks of > "my group" or "all-tasks" if allowed) > in BPM, work lists like that are usually to be linked with organization > based rules (who can do what, who is to be assigned, etc). > some customers even want users not to choose any task but to deal with > the "next" one (chosen by the BPM rules) > some customers will want to allow the "assign to someone-else-in-group" > or not, etc. > Usually, Work-Lists that are contained in plain administration console > cannot answer this real operational need --> hence the creation of > operational consoles > - one could only need to see a read-only version of the process/task. > > We may have to allow administrators to customize the operational UI to > facilitate some of the above requirements (e.g. display only the next task > vs. display all available tasks). Let's develop the first version to > support all functions provided by Activiti user tasks. Then we can add > features to configure/block certain functions for specific deployments. > > We can have a call with Cyril once we get an initial version of the UI. > > Regards, > Chathura > > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Amal Gunatilake <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Nandika, >> >> Thanks for the feedback, I will do the necessary changes and go with pure >> jaggery for the initial UI. >> >> Thank you & Best regards, >> >> *Amal Gunatilake* >> Software Engineer >> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >> lean.enterprise.middleware >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Nandika Jayawardana <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Had a chat with Ruchira. Implementing using pure jaggery is likely to >>> reduce the migration overhead when the new framework comes alone. Hence >>> lets go with pure jaggery instead of caremal and migrate when the new >>> framework is available. >>> >>> Regards >>> Nandika >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Amal Gunatilake <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Nandika, >>>> >>>> I have been working on $subject from last week onwards and I will be >>>> able to provide the sample screen-shots of the UI by the end of this week >>>> for further feedback. >>>> >>>> In prior to the discussion on thread "UI framework to be used in BPMN >>>> Human Task UI", I'm using the latter Caremel version (the one used for >>>> Stratos) to implement the initial UI. >>>> >>>> Thank you & Best regards, >>>> >>>> *Amal Gunatilake* >>>> Software Engineer >>>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >>>> lean.enterprise.middleware >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nandika Jayawardana >>> Senior Technical Lead >>> WSO2 Inc ; http://wso2.com >>> lean.enterprise.middleware >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
