Hi Azeez,Paul,All

Don't think we have come to a conclusion on this. Are we able to finalize
our approach on this as we have come to a juncture where this is required
to proceed further with next release.

Regards,
Jaminda

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Prabath Abeysekera <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Please do let us know your feedback as to how we should approach this.
>
> Cheers,
> Prabath
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Deependra Ariyadewa <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Prabath Abeysekera <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> We indeed tried using namenode federation as an alternative and IMO, it
>>> doesn't really fit in. One of the issues with that approach is, one
>>> namenode is only capable of handling just one namespace in it. Therefore,
>>> if we are to map tenants with those namespaces, then the deployment would
>>> really grow big particularly, when the number of tenants increase, as we
>>> might need to deploy at least a namenode each for all the tenants
>>> (excluding supportive nodes deployed to achieve HA for each namenode).
>>>
>>
>> MT with multiple name nodes more suitable for system that can
>> automatically instantiate name nodes. This model needs to get help form an
>> infrastructure like Stratos to instantiate name nodes. Therefore MT with
>> mutiple name nodes do not scale well in a public cloud environment.
>>
>>
>>> However, the federation approach would be ideal if we are to deal with a
>>> small number of tenants though.
>>>
>>> Deep and Shani (CC'ed) should be able to share more detailed notes on
>>> this as they've been working on this over the last couple of months.
>>>
>>
>> In the second approach we use one HDFS cluster with single name space but
>> update the INode file path information based on the tenant. In this
>> approach we do not have to update HDFS client tools. Also we can keep
>> single cluster and share HDFS resources across tenants.
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Prabath
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Paul Fremantle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Prabath
>>>>
>>>> Does HDFS support MT via multiple namenodes?
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>> On 15 October 2014 09:49, Prabath Abeysekera <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've got a 3rd party dependency (i.e Hadoop/HDFS) to be adapted into
>>>>> GIT and wondering where exactly I should do the initial developments, etc
>>>>> with the newly introduced GIT model? I do realize that I could have simply
>>>>> used a private repository or something and do the initial forking and
>>>>> stuff, but just checking if there's any recommended space available within
>>>>> any WSO2-managed repository where I could simply get the stuff checked in
>>>>> and make them available for collaborative developments within the team.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the recommended approach?
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me explain why we need to get this in created as a separate
>>>>> repository as well. We'd already done a lot of R&D around getting MT
>>>>> implemented for HDFS using the extension points exposed within Hadoop
>>>>> without any success. Tried getting ourselves into discussions with the
>>>>> Hadoop community also just to see if there's an alternative approach
>>>>> available to what we'd suggested for implementing the same but haven't
>>>>> received any positive response yet. Therefore, I'm afraid the only 
>>>>> approach
>>>>> we're left with right now is to get the sources forked into our own code
>>>>> base and moving forward with the developments. I certainly do realize that
>>>>> this would incur maintenance issues and all while trying to upgrade the
>>>>> versions, etc. However, I do not see any other feasible alternative option
>>>>> that we can make use of, in order to continue developments on this front.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please do share your feedback as to how we could resolve the
>>>>> aforementioned as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Prabath
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. Pardon if this is something that's already been discussed within
>>>>> the list, I'm just trying to get my head around this. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Prabath Abeysekara
>>>>> Associate Technical Lead, Data TG.
>>>>> WSO2 Inc.
>>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>>> Mobile: +94774171471
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Paul Fremantle
>>>> CTO and Co-Founder, WSO2
>>>> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair, Apache Member
>>>>
>>>> UK: +44 207 096 0336
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>>>> twitter.com/pzfreo
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> wso2.com Lean Enterprise Middleware
>>>>
>>>> Disclaimer: This communication may contain privileged or other
>>>> confidential information and is intended exclusively for the addressee/s.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient/s, or believe that you may have
>>>> received this communication in error, please reply to the sender indicating
>>>> that fact and delete the copy you received and in addition, you should not
>>>> print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information
>>>> contained in this communication. Internet communications cannot be
>>>> guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not
>>>> accept liability for any errors or omissions.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Prabath Abeysekara
>>> Associate Technical Lead, Data TG.
>>> WSO2 Inc.
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> Mobile: +94774171471
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Deependra Ariyadewa
>> WSO2, Inc. http://wso2.com/ http://wso2.org
>>
>> email [email protected]; cell +94 71 403 5996 ;
>> Blog http://risenfall.wordpress.com/
>> PGP info: KeyID: 'DC627E6F'
>>
>> *WSO2 - Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Prabath Abeysekara
> Associate Technical Lead, Data TG.
> WSO2 Inc.
> Email: [email protected]
> Mobile: +94774171471
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>


-- 
Jaminda Batuwangala,
Director of Engineering; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
email: [email protected] <[email protected]>; cell: +94 77 308 2174
Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to