Hi all, Suppose we move away from the Jenkins freestyle builds that we are triggering currently. Then we will not have a build number anyway. In that case we need to have an alternative approach. One would be to show the last deployed time since we already have that information in the AF_DEPLOY table in the runtime database.
Then again this would affect the consistency of the user experience. WDYT ? Regards Gayan On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Gayan Dhanushka <gay...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi Danushka, > > There is an attribute already called isBuildable. As I noticed the > deployment information is now shown for non buildable application types but > we are showing the build id (build id generated from the free style jenkins > build). IMO this is incorrect since the build id would mislead the user. So > I am +1 for having something like Manisha has mentioned. > > WDYT? > > Regards > Gayan > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Danushka Fernando <danush...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Gayan >> IMO we should have some configuration like buildable (AFAIR we already >> have this) in apptype and according to that we should draw the build >> section. >> >> Thanks & Regards >> Danushka Fernando >> Software Engineer >> WSO2 inc. http://wso2.com/ >> Mobile : +94716332729 >> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Gayan Dhanushka <gay...@wso2.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am working on [1] and the I got some things to clarify. For apptypes >>> with the build having a meaning (java web app, jaxrs, jaxws) we show a last >>> build id,status and last deployed build id on the UI. But for jaggery >>> applications in which we do not trigger an actual build, it does not make >>> much sense to show the last build id (currently there is no wall message >>> for a jaggery build as well). Showing the "Build ${id} Deployed" is also >>> misleading. But when a user does some change in the application and commit >>> it there should be some kind of a message for the user to understand >>> whether his changes are there in the currently deployed version of the >>> application as well. >>> >>> What would be the appropriate thing to do in here? >>> >>> [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/APPFAC-2978 >>> >>> Regards >>> Gayan >>> >>> Gayan Dhanuska >>> Software Engineer >>> http://wso2.com/ >>> Lean Enterprise Middleware >>> >>> Mobile >>> 071 666 2327 >>> >>> Office >>> Tel : 94 11 214 5345 >>> Fax : 94 11 214 5300 >>> >>> Twitter : https://twitter.com/gayanlggd >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev mailing list >>> Dev@wso2.org >>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Gayan Dhanuska > Software Engineer > http://wso2.com/ > Lean Enterprise Middleware > > Mobile > 071 666 2327 > > Office > Tel : 94 11 214 5345 > Fax : 94 11 214 5300 > > Twitter : https://twitter.com/gayanlggd > -- Gayan Dhanuska Software Engineer http://wso2.com/ Lean Enterprise Middleware Mobile 071 666 2327 Office Tel : 94 11 214 5345 Fax : 94 11 214 5300 Twitter : https://twitter.com/gayanlggd
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
