Hi, On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Imesh Gunaratne <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 Yes that would be the simplest approach that we can take. > @IsuruH: Can you please share the information you found on Hazelcast on > this regard? > Its at [1], section 'Discover by TCP/IP' [1]. http://docs.hazelcast.org/docs/3.4/manual/html/hazelcastclusters.html > > Thanks > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sunday, May 24, 2015, Udara Liyanage <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> As we discussed offline I tested weather carbon clustering works with >>> hostnames instead of Ips. >>> >>> I tried with two AS 5.2.1 nodes, each becoming to WKA member to the >>> other member. Members get joined and registry based deb sync worked. I will >>> try with multiple nodes and with a different product and update the thread. >>> >>> @Imesh >>> If clustering works with hostnames, shall we proceed with this approach? >>> >>> >> +1 will use hostnames >> >> >> >>> -- >>> >>> Udara Liyanage >>> Software Engineer >>> WSO2, Inc.: http://wso2.com >>> lean. enterprise. middleware >>> >>> web: http://udaraliyanage.wordpress.com >>> phone: +94 71 443 6897 >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from Gmail Mobile >> > > > > -- > *Imesh Gunaratne* > Senior Technical Lead > WSO2 Inc: http://wso2.com > T: +94 11 214 5345 M: +94 77 374 2057 > W: http://imesh.gunaratne.org > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware > > -- Thanks and Regards, Isuru H. +94 716 358 048* <http://wso2.com/>*
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
