Hi CD,

No worries.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:11 PM, CD Athuraliya <chathur...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi Nirmal,
>
> We will be able to fix this issue.
>
> Thanks Thushan for pointing this out! :)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Nirmal Fernando <nir...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> @CD, is this something we could fix? can we list features in the order of
>> the indices?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Thushan Ganegedara <thu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I noticed that, in certain cases, the features don't follow the correct
>>> ordering. Any idea why this is happening?
>>>
>>> For example in this image, V10 appears after V1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Thushan Ganegedara <thu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> After a daunting struggle, I was able to corner the issue with the poor
>>>> accuracy for the specific leaf dataset. The dataset has classes from 1 to
>>>> 36. However, there are no classes from 16th - 22nd. i.e. Classes go as
>>>> 1,2,..,14,15,23,24,...,35,36
>>>>
>>>> Then, while converting these class labels to enums in H-2-O (combined
>>>> with the fact that there's very little data for each class) confuses H-2-O
>>>> and causes it to *assign different enum values for the same classes in
>>>> different datasets*. Which manifest itself as a poor accuracy.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that there's a mismatch between the labels provided by
>>>> JavaRDD and enums produced by H-2-O as well. I'm looking into this issue
>>>> right now.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Thushan Ganegedara <thu...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been testing the new Deeplearning component with few different
>>>>> datasets (mainly leaf dataset) and the leaf dataset seems to be not 
>>>>> working
>>>>> as expected for an unknown reason.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I tested the Deeplearning component extensively with the leaf
>>>>> dataset and identified several potential problems that might be causing 
>>>>> the
>>>>> poor accuracy.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Need to have higher number of epochs (compared to other datasets)
>>>>> to produce a reasonable accuracy.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Too many neurons causing overfitting thereby causing poor accuracy.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. Some classes have quite closely related features (Especially the
>>>>> latter classes are misclassified often)
>>>>>
>>>>> I was able to get an accuracy of 86% with Logistic Regression L-BFGS.
>>>>> Which is quite reasonable. But I'm having trouble reaching that accuracy
>>>>> with Deeplearning (which should be quite easy). Highest accuracy I reached
>>>>> so far is 71.xx%
>>>>>
>>>>> So I'm still looking for any definite issues causing the poor accuracy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thushan Ganegedara
>>>>> School of IT
>>>>> University of Sydney, Australia
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Thushan Ganegedara
>>>> School of IT
>>>> University of Sydney, Australia
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Thushan Ganegedara
>>> School of IT
>>> University of Sydney, Australia
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks & regards,
>> Nirmal
>>
>> Team Lead - WSO2 Machine Learner
>> Associate Technical Lead - Data Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc.
>> Mobile: +94715779733
>> Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *CD Athuraliya*
> Software Engineer
> WSO2, Inc.
> lean . enterprise . middleware
> Mobile: +94 716288847 <94716288847>
> LinkedIn <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/cdathuraliya> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/cdathuraliya> | Blog
> <http://cdathuraliya.tumblr.com/>
>



-- 
Regards,

Thushan Ganegedara
School of IT
University of Sydney, Australia
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to