Hi Samiyuru, Can we evaluate the use of Kryo [1] or similar serialization library instead of default java serilalizer while doing $subject? They kryo will reduce CPU usage/byte size significantly than default java serializers and better in deep cloning. Please see [2][3].
I hope you are planning to write our own serialization filter/valve rather than using pre-existing one you mentioned on [4]. It would be better we write the session replication filter/valve such that it would be easy to replace the hazelcast with something else in future. [1] https://github.com/EsotericSoftware/kryo [2] http://blog.hazelcast.com/kryo-serializer/ [3] http://blog.hazelcast.com/comparing-serialization-methods/ [4] https://hazelcast.com/use-cases/web-session-clustering/generic-web- session-replication/ Cheers, Ruwan On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Samiyuru Senarathne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am in the process of implementing session replication for the WSO2 > Application Server. For that, Hazelcast session replication [1] is > suggested. I would like to know your ideas regarding this. > > [1] - > https://hazelcast.com/use-cases/web-session-clustering/generic-web-session-replication/ > > Thanks, > > -- > Samiyuru Senarathne > *Software Engineer* > Mobile : +94 (0) 71 134 6087 > [email protected] have a chat regarding a fast track project :)to have a > chat regarding a fast track project :)to have a chat regarding a fast track > project :) <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev > > -- *Ruwan Abeykoon* *Architect,* *WSO2, Inc. http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com/> * *lean.enterprise.middleware.* email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
