Ack. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Sameera Jayasoma <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rajith, > > The correct one should be [1.6.1, 1.7) AFAIK. > > Niranjan please update the document. > > Thanks, > Sameera. > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Rajith Vitharana <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> How should we do the $subject? Asking this since in carbon commons axis2 >> version range is defined as in [1] don't we follow the same concept for >> orbit bundles? shouldn't this be as [2]? >> >> [1] - <axis2.osgi.version.range>[1.6.1.wso2v14, >> 1.7.0)</axis2.osgi.version.range> >> [2] - <axis2.osgi.version.range>[1.6, 1.7)</axis2.osgi.version.range> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Rajith Vitharana >> >> Software Engineer, >> WSO2 Inc. : wso2.com >> Mobile : +94715883223 >> Blog : http://lankavitharana.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > -- > Sameera Jayasoma, > Software Architect, > > WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com) > email: [email protected] > blog: http://blog.sameera.org > twitter: https://twitter.com/sameerajayasoma > flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sameera-jayasoma/collections > Mobile: 0094776364456 > > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware > > -- *Niranjan Karunanandham* Senior Software Engineer - WSO2 Inc. WSO2 Inc.: http://www.wso2.com
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
