Hi, While profiling the MB we found out that there is a performance bottle neck in using util.ConcurrentSkipListMap. Because every time size call is made it has to loop through the data structure so it takes O(n) time. But looking at GC ConcurrentHashMap we found out that it only takes constant time (O(1) time) to make the size call.Other operations on GC ConcurrentHashMap are also faster than uti.ConcurrentSkipListMap.
Here I have attached JMH Benchmark results which acquired by testing util.ConcurrentSkipListMap vs GC ConcurrentHashMap ConcurrentSkipListMap Vs Goldmansachs Concurre... <https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/spreadsheets/d/1y5w1aIDBN89C0ctB83iDOULtYPnB_-3OuGYArd0lbt0/edit?usp=drive_web> Malaka Gangananda Software Engineer Intern mobile:0713564340 mala...@wso2.com <thila...@wso2.com>
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
