Hi Venkat, I have gone through your usecases document and it seems good.We need to figure out a way how we can actually implement those usecases. As Kasun mentioned please look in to carbon transport implementation and try to write a simple engine . Basically we need figure out best way for configure transport according to configurations given through engine . for example we need to configure transport for SSL support and those informations are published by loadbalancer engine to the transport any how those need to be loosely couple with transport implementation .
thanks On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Venkat Raman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kasun, > > Thank you for your valuable guidance. I started drafting my proposal. > I'll look into it and come up with design and share it with you. > > > > *Thanks,* > *Venkat.* > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Kasun Indrasiri <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Venkat, >> >> May be you should start going through the carbon http transport and GW >> code[1]. Please not that we won't be using Camel as the message routing >> engine for the loadbalancer as it too heavy weight. I think, >> understanding[2] about OSGI and how carbon transport/messaging/engine works >> together is important at this point. >> >> [1] source code locations >> https://github.com/wso2/carbon-transports >> https://github.com/wso2/carbon-messaging >> https://github.com/wso2/product-gw >> >> [2] >> http://shafreenanfar.blogspot.com/2016/03/write-your-own-engine-for-wso2-gw.html >> >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Venkat Raman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Isuru & Kasun, >>> >>> Good morning. Kindly find the attached document for comparison between >>> few existing LBs. >>> >>> Looking forward to hear feedback from you regarding my initial design. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> *Venkat.* >>> Hi Isuru & Kasun, >>> >>> Kindly find the attached USE CASE document for HTTP Load balancing. >>> This document also includes, my basic outline of deliverables that I am >>> planning for this GSoC 2016. >>> >>> Will be eagerly waiting for your response and guidance. >>> >>> I have also signed up for the Proposal writing guidance conference that >>> you are organizing. Will I be able to attend it through video >>> conferencing.? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Thanks,* >>> *Venkat.* >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Venkat Raman <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Isuru, >>>> >>>> Thank you. By EOD I'll also mail you these use cases pertained to HTTP >>>> Load Balancing. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Venkat. >>>> On Mar 11, 2016 10:49 AM, "Isuru Ranawaka" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Venkat, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the great enthusiasm. We will look in to that and let you >>>>> know soon. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Venkat Raman <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Isuru & Kasun, >>>>>> >>>>>> Good morning. Is the initial design diagram that I mailed is good ? >>>>>> Eagerly awaiting for your response and guidance. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Thanks,* >>>>>> *Venkat.* >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Venkat Raman <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Isuru & Kasun, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for sharing the slide. It is of great help. I have done >>>>>>> lots of reading and also learned about many new and fascinating >>>>>>> technologies. I have come up with a set of features and also initial >>>>>>> design diagram. You can find it in the document and image attached >>>>>>> below. >>>>>>> I came up with this architecture design with reference to the design >>>>>>> given >>>>>>> in slide provided by Kasun. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am so eager about this project and I am interested to design and >>>>>>> deliver it with high quality. Kindly go through the attached document, >>>>>>> guide and correct me appropriately. Once I satisfy your design and >>>>>>> feature >>>>>>> expectation, I will provide comparison between existing LBs and our LB. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Will be looking forward to your guidance and corrections. >>>>>>> Meanwhile, I'll go through the code in much deeper way and also evaluate >>>>>>> few existing LBs for feature comparison. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Thanks,* >>>>>>> *Venkat.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Kasun Indrasiri <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Venkat, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please check [1]. Hope that help. Also, can you please come up with >>>>>>>> the use cases which are specific to HTTP load balancing? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>> http://www.slideshare.net/kasun04/wso2-gateway?qid=9c8d89a4-e982-4883-87a8-ac2dca7bf223&v=&b=&from_search=1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Venkat Raman <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Isuru, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you this document helped me to understand requirements of >>>>>>>>> this Proposal in a much clear way. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yesterday I downloaded Beta3 release of product-gw and tried >>>>>>>>> header based and REST based mediation. And I also started learning >>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>> Apache Camel. I also noticed Netty logs while starting gateway. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I could understand how product-gw will work and the degree of >>>>>>>>> customization it provides. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I also did research on HTTP LBs and read about Google App Engine >>>>>>>>> LB in detail. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, sure. I'll do these background work >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It would be helpful if you could provide me detailed Architecture >>>>>>>>> Diagrams for Carbon Messaging, Carbon Transports and Product Gateway >>>>>>>>> also. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Venkat. >>>>>>>>> On Mar 4, 2016 3:06 PM, "Isuru Ranawaka" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Venkat , >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can look in to this and start doing background reasearch. Let >>>>>>>>>> me know anythings that need to be know >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Venkat Raman < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kasun, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your guidance. Sure, I'll start exploring GW and also >>>>>>>>>>> come up with design. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* >>>>>>>>>>> *Venkat.* >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Kasun Indrasiri <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Venkat, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your interest in the above proposal. Yes, the same >>>>>>>>>>>> link is valid for all the projects related GW (I've updated the >>>>>>>>>>>> references). So, to get started with you can start running the >>>>>>>>>>>> samples and >>>>>>>>>>>> going through the code base of GW. >>>>>>>>>>>> Also you can come up with the use cases that you are planning >>>>>>>>>>>> to add on top of HTTP GW. And come up with a design of the >>>>>>>>>>>> existing GW and >>>>>>>>>>>> how the LB related features will be implemented on the GW. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please subscribe to [email protected] and use that mailing list to >>>>>>>>>>>> communicate with the developers at WSO2. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Venkat Raman < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Isuru & Kasun, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am Venkatraman, pursuing Final year B.Tech Computer Science >>>>>>>>>>>>> & Engineering in SASTRA University (Undergraduate Course), India. >>>>>>>>>>>>> My area >>>>>>>>>>>>> of interest is Computer Networking and I am also proficient in >>>>>>>>>>>>> JAVA >>>>>>>>>>>>> programming. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I came to know about WSO2 through its contribution in GSOC >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015 and I'm very eager & excited to work on WSO2 products. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The other proposals involving WSO2 gateway have >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/wso2/product-gw as reference URL. But in >>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposal 8 no refgerence URL is mentioned. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you kindly guide me in starting with this proposal idea? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Will be looking forward to hear from you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Venkat.* >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Kasun Indrasiri >>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect >>>>>>>>>>>> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >>>>>>>>>>>> lean.enterprise.middleware >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cell: +94 77 556 5206 >>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards >>>>>>>>>> Isuru Ranawaka >>>>>>>>>> M: +94714629880 >>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://isurur.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Kasun Indrasiri >>>>>>>> Software Architect >>>>>>>> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >>>>>>>> lean.enterprise.middleware >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cell: +94 77 556 5206 >>>>>>>> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best Regards >>>>> Isuru Ranawaka >>>>> M: +94714629880 >>>>> Blog : http://isurur.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Kasun Indrasiri >> Software Architect >> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >> lean.enterprise.middleware >> >> cell: +94 77 556 5206 >> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/ >> > > -- Best Regards Isuru Ranawaka M: +94714629880 Blog : http://isurur.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
