Thank you for the information Dilshani.

I will check with the ESB/MB teams on what you have mentioned with regards
to doc bugs/improvements and fix those.

Best Regards,
Nisrin



Nisrin Sheriff
Senior Technical Writer

*WSO2, Inc.*lean.enterprise.middleware.
mobile: +94 776 24 84 56
http://wso2.com

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Dilshani Subasinghe <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Adding Chanaka
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Dilshani Subasinghe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently I am testing JMS transport parameters of ESB 5.0.0 alpha pack
>> with MB 3.1.0 as the broker. While testing that, identified following
>> factors:
>>
>>    - As the JMS receiver, ESB can use proxy and inbound endpoints.
>>    - While using jms transport within proxy, that will always pick up
>>    default parameters defined with in axis2.xml.
>>
>> While enabling jms transport for ESB, have to uncomment following
>> fragments:
>>
>> <transportReceiver name="jms"
>> class="org.apache.axis2.transport.jms.JMSListener">
>>         <parameter name="myTopicConnectionFactory" locked="false">
>>             <parameter name="java.naming.factory.initial"
>> locked="false">org.wso2.andes.jndi.PropertiesFileInitialContextFactory</parameter>
>>             <parameter name="java.naming.provider.url"
>> locked="false">repository/conf/jndi.properties</parameter>
>>             <parameter name="transport.jms.ConnectionFactoryJNDIName"
>> locked="false">TopicConnectionFactory parameter>
>>             <parameter name="transport.jms.ConnectionFactoryType"
>> locked="false">topic</parameter>
>>         </parameter>
>>
>>         <parameter name="myQueueConnectionFactory" locked="false">
>>             <parameter name="java.naming.factory.initial"
>> locked="false">org.wso2.andes.jndi.PropertiesFileInitialContextFactory</parameter>
>>             <parameter name="java.naming.provider.url"
>> locked="false">repository/conf/jndi.properties</parameter>
>>             <parameter name="transport.jms.ConnectionFactoryJNDIName"
>> locked="false">QueueConnectionFactory</parameter>
>>            <parameter name="transport.jms.ConnectionFactoryType"
>> locked="false">queue</parameter>
>>         </parameter>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *<parameter name="default" locked="false">            <parameter
>> name="java.naming.factory.initial"
>> locked="false">org.wso2.andes.jndi.PropertiesFileInitialContextFactory</parameter>
>> <parameter name="java.naming.provider.url"
>> locked="false">repository/conf/jndi.properties</parameter>
>> <parameter name="transport.jms.ConnectionFactoryJNDIName"
>> locked="false">QueueConnectionFactory</parameter>            <parameter
>> name="transport.jms.ConnectionFactoryType"
>> locked="false">queue</parameter>        </parameter>*
>>     </transportReceiver>
>>
>> But enabling jms transaction only consider about "default" parameters.
>>
>>    - With above scenario, *user may cannot listen to topic and queue
>>    within one ESB instance.*
>>    - As a further identification, found the article [2] which will
>>    address above scenario with a proper solution. Within that article, user
>>    have to add extra parameters to override default configurations.
>>
>> <parameter name="transport.jms.ContentType">
>>          <rules>
>>              <jmsProperty>contentType</jmsProperty>
>>              <default>application/xml</default>
>>          </rules>
>>      </parameter>
>>      <parameter
>> name="transport.jms.ConnectionFactory">myQueueConnectionFactory</parameter>
>>      <parameter name="transport.jms.Destination">myQueue</parameter>
>>      <parameter name="transport.jms.DestinationType">queue</parameter>
>>
>>    - With these configuration, it can successfully achieve the use case
>>    of listening to both topic and queue within one ESB instance.
>>
>> 1. Is there any other method to fulfill above user requirement ?
>>
>> 2. When considering documentation noticed following bugs and improvements:
>>
>>    - Docs were not clearly identified enabling jms transport in proxy [1]
>>    - Docs didn't mention about way of addressing above scenario and the
>>    need of adding exact parameters for axis2.xml [4]
>>
>> If above mention method is the only one to achieve the scenario, it may
>> have to update docs properly. Added document jira for required
>> modifications [5].
>>
>> @ESB/MB Team - Please correct me if I have any misunderstanding about the
>> flow or functionality of features.
>> [1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB500/JMS+Transport
>> [2]
>> http://wso2.com/library/articles/2013/03/configuring-wso2-esb-wso2-message-broker/
>> [3] https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB470/Proxy+Services
>> [4]
>> https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB500/Configure+with+WSO2+Message+Broker
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Dilshani Subasinghe
>> Software Engineer - QA
>> WSO2, Inc.;http://wso2.com/
>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwso2.com%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGJuLRux6KkJwXKVUCYOtEsNCmIAQ>
>> lean.enterprise.middleware
>> Mobile: +94773375185
>> Blog: dilshanilive.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Dilshani Subasinghe
> Software Engineer - QA
> WSO2, Inc.;http://wso2.com/
> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwso2.com%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGJuLRux6KkJwXKVUCYOtEsNCmIAQ>
> lean.enterprise.middleware
> Mobile: +94773375185
> Blog: dilshanilive.blogspot.com
>
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to