+1 for having it as APPMSESSIONID. There are few places in the code we do
some functionalities by getting this cookie value. We have to change those
places and test properly.

Regards,
Dinusha.

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Rushmin Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I suggest that we should do the aforementioned change.
>
> *Reason*
>
> Even though we use SAML as the authentication mechanism in the gateway as
> of now, we might use different authentication mechanisms in near future.
> And session handling should be independent of authentication mechanism.
>
> So binding the name of the cookie to 'SAML' is ugly
>
> WDYT ?
>
>
>
> --
> *Best Regards*
>
> *Rushmin Fernando*
> *Technical Lead*
>
> WSO2 Inc. <http://wso2.com/> - Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
> mobile : +94772891266
>
>
>


-- 
Dinusha Dilrukshi
Associate Technical Lead
WSO2 Inc.: http://wso2.com/
Mobile: +94725255071
Blog: http://dinushasblog.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to