On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam <
mo...@wso2.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Tanya Madurapperuma <ta...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This warning is coming from shindig which is the underlying library that
>> we used for gadget rendering and is a 3rd party library. Quick solution for
>> this is to increase maxDepth value as mentioned in [1] by Mohan.
>> If not we will have to analyze EhCache memory for memory consuming
>> objects [2] [3]
>>
>> [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/ANLYIS-48
>> [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SHINDIG/Debuggin
>> g+EhCache's+SizeOfEngine
>> [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SHINDIG/EhCache+
>> Memory+Analysis
>>
>
> @Tanya, Thanks for the response.. I think, increasing the maxDepth value
> is not helpful all the time.. Whether you guys, explored about this more ?
>
AFAIK it depends on the rendered gadgets in the dashboard. Hence need to be
explored on the particular dashboard itself.

> Since it is observed in various products/cases. If this log does not
> reflect any useful info then can, we disable that at log4j level ?
>
@ Sinthuja and team : WDYT? Shall we invest sometime on this?

Thanks,
Tanya

>
> Thanks,
> Mohan
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tanya
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam <
>> mo...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> [Moving to DEV]
>>>
>>> Related UES/DS jira is [1]..
>>>
>>> @Sewmini, above logs are only printed once for a user (When loading a
>>> gadget for first time - once for each gadget)..
>>>
>>> [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/UES-658
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mohan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Sewmini Jayaweera <sewm...@wso2.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi DS team,
>>>>
>>>> I observed the same issue reported in [1] in the latest Analytics pack
>>>> given. I reopened the issue since repeatedly printed warning may mislead
>>>> user thinking it's a critical issue eve,n though it is harmless and it
>>>> doesn't give a good impression to the user.
>>>>
>>>> It would be great if we can get this fixed. If it is difficult to fix
>>>> it in this release can we change it to an improvement and fix it later
>>>> without having it as won't fix?
>>>>
>>>> [1]. https://wso2.org/jira/browse/ANLYIS-48
>>>>
>>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Sewmini Jayaweera
>>>> *Software Engineer - QA Team*
>>>> Mobile: +94 (0) 773 381 250
>>>> sewm...@wso2.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *V. Mohanadarshan*
>>> *Associate Tech Lead,*
>>> *Data Technologies Team,*
>>> *WSO2, Inc. http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com> *
>>> *lean.enterprise.middleware.*
>>>
>>> email: mo...@wso2.com
>>> phone:(+94) 771117673
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tanya Madurapperuma
>>
>> Senior Software Engineer,
>> WSO2 Inc. : wso2.com
>> Mobile : +94718184439
>> Blog : http://tanyamadurapperuma.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *V. Mohanadarshan*
> *Associate Tech Lead,*
> *Data Technologies Team,*
> *WSO2, Inc. http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com> *
> *lean.enterprise.middleware.*
>
> email: mo...@wso2.com
> phone:(+94) 771117673
>



-- 
Tanya Madurapperuma

Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc. : wso2.com
Mobile : +94718184439
Blog : http://tanyamadurapperuma.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to