> Yes, we can have it in the kernel feature, but then if there is any > improvement or changes to Carbon-utils repo then we would need to do a > kernel release. IMO it would be better to have a separate feature for > Carbon-utils. In this way we can independently release carbon-utils. In the > other component such as carbon-secvault, the carbon-utils feature can be > defined as an import feature def. WDYT? >
+1 to make carbon-utils as a separate feature. since carbon-secvault and carbon-config no longer depends on carbon-kernel, we cannot have it in the kernel feature. -- *Danesh Kuruppu* Senior Software Engineer | WSO2 Email: [email protected] Mobile: +94 (77) 1690552 Web: WSO2 Inc <https://wso2.com/signature>
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
