Hi VIndula, You can use https://github.com/wso2-incubator/scim2-compliance-test-suite for your development. Please send a PR with the current code.
Regards, Omindu. On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Omindu Rathnaweera <omi...@wso2.com> wrote: > Scheduled the meeting on 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm. Hope you've got the > request. > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < > vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Yes I can do a demo on the current implementation. How about the June >> 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm ? >> >> Please find the following details to test the /ServiceProviderConfig >> endpoint. >> >> 1. Start the IS instance locally. >> 2. Deploy the scimproxycompliance.war >> 3. On the UI, select Compliance Test 2.0 tab >> 4. Enter the IS SCIM base url as : https://localhost:9443 >> >> I have tested with mocked IS 5.3.0 instance with SCIM 2.0 support. >> >> Thank you. >> >> *Vindula Jayawardana* >> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >> University of Moratuwa >> mobile : +713462554 >> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >> >> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "* >> >> >> *-Richard Branson-* >> >> >> >> On 26 June 2017 at 10:42, Omindu Rathnaweera <omi...@wso2.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Vindula, >>> >>> Would it possible for you to arrange the demo within the evaluation time >>> period (26th - 30th)? Also please share the instructions to try out the ' >>> ServiceProviderConfig' test. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Omindu. >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < >>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was able to implement /ServiceProviderConfig endpoint compliance test >>>> as an end to end test [1]. >>>> >>>> As discussed I used feign JAX-RS client. I did not directly use Charon >>>> core objects [1][2] in REST client due to json encoding and decoding >>>> problem as mentioned by Gayan in the previous mail. Hence I implemented >>>> separate object object models for this purpose. >>>> >>>> I am hoping to arrange a demo of the currently implemented test and >>>> also it will be better if I can get your opinions on verifying the >>>> architecture of the current implementation. Shall we have a quick demo >>>> session on Thursday (22nd) ? >>>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/Vindulamj/SCIM-2.0-Complience-Test-Suite >>>> [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo >>>> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java >>>> [3] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo >>>> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>> University of Moratuwa >>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>> >>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. >>>> "* >>>> >>>> >>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11 June 2017 at 19:02, Gayan Gunawardana <ga...@wso2.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Vindula, >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Kindly find the weekly update below. >>>>>> >>>>>> Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp >>>>>> component proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked >>>>>> in to implementing scimcore component as well. In implementing the >>>>>> scimcore >>>>>> component, as we discussed in the previous mails, I used the Charon code >>>>>> (which relates to scheme specifications only) as a base code. >>>>>> >>>>> You suppose to use feign JAX-RS client right ? Can you directly use >>>>> charon core objects [1][2] in REST client or did you implement your own >>>>> object model ? I guess you may find json encoding and decoding problem >>>>> with >>>>> charon core standard objects. >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-co >>>>> re/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java >>>>> [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-co >>>>> re/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In this week, I am planning on look into the scimcore component more >>>>>> with adhering to schema specification. Also I did not mock the SCIM 1.1 >>>>>> /Schemas endpoint in IS yet since it is not that urgent at the moment (it >>>>>> is helpful in understanding the protocol specification). Hence I will >>>>>> look >>>>>> into mock that as well since now I can work with protocol specification >>>>>> as >>>>>> well. >>>>>> >>>>> Could you able to run SCIM 1.1 compliance test if you mock /Schemas >>>>> endpoint ? This task also important to get an understanding about >>>>> compliance test. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>> >>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 29 May 2017 at 10:50, Gayan Gunawardana <ga...@wso2.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have been working on understanding more on the current SCIM 1.1 >>>>>>>> test suite. Hence I further analyzed it and identified the following >>>>>>>> possibilities. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. Apart from the specification specific implementation aspects, a >>>>>>>> significant amount of code reuse can be done from the current code >>>>>>>> base. >>>>>>>> However as per the SCIM mailing list [1] some concerns were raised >>>>>>>> regarding the current structure of the implementation. >>>>>>>> 2. For the proposed scim core component, we can make use of the >>>>>>>> Charon [2] code base as a start. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As Identity Server currently supports SCIM 2.0 in the C5 >>>>>>>> architecture only, I have added a PR [3] and a jira [4] to make it >>>>>>>> available for C4 architecture as well. Greatly appreciate if you can >>>>>>>> review >>>>>>>> it and merge. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> We will review [3],[4] btw can you continue the work with IS 6.0.0 >>>>>>> in C5 ? I guess for compliance test it won't make much difference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am currently working in the webapp of the component architecture >>>>>>>> proposed and hoping to start implementing the scimcore component in the >>>>>>>> coming week. Apart from that, will look into mocking the /Schemas >>>>>>>> endpoint >>>>>>>> in the SCIM 1.1 implementation of Identity Server to get a better >>>>>>>> understanding on how the SCIM 1.1 test suite works with IS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Great progress Vindula keep it up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/JYFpusDrtQ94hnghv >>>>>>>> EPjczU4laE >>>>>>>> [2] - https://github.com/wso2/charon >>>>>>>> [3] - https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provis >>>>>>>> ioning-scim2/pull/16 >>>>>>>> [4] - https://wso2.org/jira/projects/IDENTITY/issues/IDENTITY-5942 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2 April 2017 at 18:29, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Omindu, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you for the prompt feedback on the draft proposal. I >>>>>>>>> incorporated the suggestions you made on the proposal. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As also mentioned in the proposal, I made the configuration >>>>>>>>> options more flexible by giving the manual configuration feasibility >>>>>>>>> to the >>>>>>>>> tester as an optional feature apart from what is mandatory in the >>>>>>>>> project. >>>>>>>>> I hope that would give us the required flexibility in the SCIM 2.0 >>>>>>>>> compliance test suite in terms of configuration options. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2 April 2017 at 17:08, Omindu Rathnaweera <omi...@wso2.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Will have a look Vindula. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for putting an effort on running the 1.1 test. The >>>>>>>>>> intention behind it was to get a general idea on what to include in >>>>>>>>>> the 2.0 >>>>>>>>>> test suite and the areas to be improved. What you have obtained >>>>>>>>>> should be >>>>>>>>>> enough to understand the nature of the tests and basics information >>>>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>>> captured. I agree on the fact that the configuration options should >>>>>>>>>> be more >>>>>>>>>> flexible. Let's capture this in the project proposal if you haven't >>>>>>>>>> already. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Omindu. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>>>>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I shared my draft proposal in GSoC dashboard and I kindly >>>>>>>>>>> request your feedback in improving the proposal. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>>>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>>>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>>>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>>>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 30 March 2017 at 23:13, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>>>>>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test >>>>>>>>>>>> suite [1]. Due to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires >>>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>> internet facing SCIM 1.1 server to run the tests against, I >>>>>>>>>>>> setup-ed an >>>>>>>>>>>> Identity Server instance in AWS [2]. However when the test are >>>>>>>>>>>> run, it >>>>>>>>>>>> fails due to /ServiceProviderConfigs and /Schemas endpoints. As >>>>>>>>>>>> WSO2 SCIM >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.1 support [3] is not covering the mentioned two endpoints, >>>>>>>>>>>> tests are failing when run. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> However in order to get an idea on how the result >>>>>>>>>>>> representation had been done in SCIM 1.1 compliance test suit, I >>>>>>>>>>>> mocked the >>>>>>>>>>>> /ServiceProviderConfigs endpoint [4] and was able to get the >>>>>>>>>>>> following output. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the complexity of mocking the /Schemas endpoint and also >>>>>>>>>>>> as the test on one endpoint ( /ServiceProviderConfigs) could >>>>>>>>>>>> give the nature of the result representation as seen above, I did >>>>>>>>>>>> not try >>>>>>>>>>>> to mock /Schemas endpoint and run the test suit again. However I >>>>>>>>>>>> tried by >>>>>>>>>>>> mocking the endpoint with 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED [5] as the output, >>>>>>>>>>>> but that >>>>>>>>>>>> was not accepted by the test suit as a valid return object. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> However, in my opinion, the SCIM test suit should be flexible >>>>>>>>>>>> in nature to skip any test which was given the input from the SCIM >>>>>>>>>>>> server >>>>>>>>>>>> as 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED [5]. I encourage such kind of >>>>>>>>>>>> implementation to be >>>>>>>>>>>> adopted in the proposed SCIM 2.0 compliance test suit as in that >>>>>>>>>>>> way the >>>>>>>>>>>> test suit acknowledges the SP's inability to provide those >>>>>>>>>>>> endpoints while >>>>>>>>>>>> making sure such kind of inability does not compromise the ability >>>>>>>>>>>> to run >>>>>>>>>>>> the test suit on other endpoints. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://www.simplecloud.info/#complianceTest >>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://aws.amazon.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>> [3] - https://github.com/wso2/charon/tree/release-2.0.7 >>>>>>>>>>>> [4] - https://github.com/Vindulamj >>>>>>>>>>>> /mocked-identity-inbound-provisioning-scim/tree/master/ident >>>>>>>>>>>> ity-inbound-provisioning-scim-master >>>>>>>>>>>> [5] - http://www.simplecloud.info/ >>>>>>>>>>>> specs/draft-scim-api-01.html#anchor6 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>>>>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>>>>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>>>>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>>>>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 March 2017 at 16:42, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>>>>>>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for the prompt replies. I will look into >>>>>>>>>>>>> the points you have mentioned and will keep you updated here. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>>>>>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>>>>>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>>>>>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9 March 2017 at 21:22, Omindu Rathnaweera <omi...@wso2.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Vindula, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we can run the existing 1.1 test on IS and see the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated output, that will be a good point to start. However >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we'll need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> host an IS instance publicly to run the tests on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Omindu. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Gayan Gunawardana < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ga...@wso2.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Vindula, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your interest in this project. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since you have good knowledge about SCIM 2.0 specifications, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could you please look at SCIM 1.1 compliance test and source >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code [1]. SCIM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 compliance test doesn't need to be same as SCIM 1.1 just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get an idea >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from SCIM 1.1 compliance test. Further you can extract test >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scenarios from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://github.com/erdtman/simplecloud.info >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ferdtman%2Fsimplecloud.info&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGycfiBxzWbdCVjpGlABAw9OXxGaQ> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sioning-scim2/tree/master/tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gayan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am Vindula Jayawardana, a final year undergraduate of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Department of University of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Moratuwa. I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interested in applying for the "Proposal 21: [IS] SCIM 2.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compliance test suite" which you have offered for the GSoC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project idea >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pool. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a good understanding on SCIM core and protocol >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specifications for both SCIM 1.1 and SCIM 2.0. Based on my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge I have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> written few blog posts specifically catering on SCIM [1] and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the use cases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of SCIM [2]. Also I have tried SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 APIs of wso2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IS. I went >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> though the references provided and would like to know more on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope of the coverage report and detailed analysis view need >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated as a deliverable. Could you kindly guide me on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said matter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://medium.com/@vindulajay >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awardana/scim-make-it-fast-che >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ap-and-easy-b2bd56492c15#.ec1kncbde >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://medium.com/@vindulajay >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awardana/5-things-that-will-no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t-be-a-nightmare-anymore-if-yo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u-support-scim-9353d73836a7#.ihcm9aqub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to impress. "* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gayan Gunawardana >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email: ga...@wso2.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Omindu Rathnaweera >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Omindu Rathnaweera >>>>>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >>>>>>>>>> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Gayan Gunawardana >>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ >>>>>>> Email: ga...@wso2.com >>>>>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Gayan Gunawardana >>>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ >>>>> Email: ga...@wso2.com >>>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Omindu Rathnaweera >>> Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >>> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Omindu Rathnaweera > Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. > Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211> > -- Omindu Rathnaweera Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. Mobile: +94 771 197 211
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
