+1, no exact reason for not considering null, as I remember, most probably missed it.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Vinod Kavinda <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > I'm working on fixing the issue [1]. The reason for the issue is we have > not considered the *null *in the code line [2]. According to the JSON > spec [3], null also treated he same way like other primitive types. > > Any particular reason for not to add *null?* > Shall we add the null also in the line [2] ? > > [1] - https://github.com/wso2/product-ei/issues/1406 > [2] - https://github.com/wso2/carbon-business-process/blob/ > master/components/bpmn/org.wso2.carbon.bpmn/src/main/ > java/org/wso2/carbon/bpmn/core/types/datatypes/json/api/ > JsonNodeObject.java#L77 > [3] - http://www.json.org/ > > Regards, > Vinod > > -- > Vinod Kavinda > Senior Software Engineer > *WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware <http://www.wso2.com>.* > Mobile : +94 (0) 712 415544 > Blog : http://soatechflicks.blogspot.com/ > [image: http://wso2.com/signature] > <http://wso2.com/signature> > > -- Milinda Perera Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com , Mobile: (+94) 714 115 032
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
