On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 21:11 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 07:12:27PM +0000, Noud de Brouwer wrote: > > To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > > [email protected] > > Subject: Re: pkg/47488: textproc/xalan-c got removed; find replacement in > > > (...) > > This is *so* wrong in so many respects. > > tech-pkg is about pkgsrc *infrastructure* (basically - pkgtools, the mk
the procedures are part the infrastructure. -- noud > subtree, and maybe generic methods to access shells, compilers, language > interpreters etc for the purpose of building or executing pkgsrc-built > software. It's wrong most of the time when you write about individual > packages. > > gnats-bugs is for replying to existing PRs. It should not be intermixed > with external traffic, as it will make the noted PR unreadable. > > pkgsrc-bugs is for followups to such gen generic instructions > > the -admin is the sender address for gnats' messages about PR changes. > > Using all at once is bad, especially intermixed with messages to outside > people/lists. > > If you want to clarify a software's status, please do so and > summarize results to the referring PR if one exists, or to tech-pkg > *or* pkgsrc-users (depending of what seems more appropriate) or maybe > the noted package maintainer. > > Regards, > -is --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
