On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Scott Boag <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In order to build that community, a strong purpose would need to drive it, > above what the current os offerings provide, including Saxon. So, give it > some thought. > my personal thoughts, I think despite IBM not willing to support further XSLT (3.0) development at Xalan, we should still have a goal to implement XSLT 3.0 at Xalan. Yes and I strongly feel (agreeing to Scott's point earlier) that we should start developing for XSLT 3.0 and not 2.0 (we can skip XSLT 2.0 development altogether). We should implement the 3.0 processor, as schema aware, supporting streaming and with all other goodies defined in the spec. In case, Xalan decides to start developing XSLT 3.0 processor, I'll be happy to be a committer to that project (I'm also a Xerces-J committer); sorry if this sounds rude. I'd like to contribute actively to any XSLT 3.0 development at Xalan. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
