Hi Mukul, I tested Xalan locally with BCEL 6.7.0-SNAPSHOT and updated the xalan-java repo.
I _think_ my local Xalan builds and tests are OK but I am not 100% sure because all of these Ant targets produce so much output. Would you please run your builds and let me know your findings? If all is well, I can create an RC for BCEL. TY! Gary On 2022/11/19 12:21:59 Gary Gregory wrote: > Yes, I'll let you know here. I found some other "normal" bugs in the > current code base but I am not sure if these should delay 6.7.0; these are > all in the verifier which I don't think Xalan would use. > > Gary > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2022, 07:00 Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Gary, > > I guess, you'd want to release XalanJ 2.7.3 using BCEL 6.7.0 > > (hoping so, unless we face any tests regression using this future BCEL > > version). Please correct me, if I'm wrong. > > > > Please let us know, when any BCEL 6.7.0 RC is available, or the BCEL > > 6.7.0 final version is itself available, so that we may test XalanJ > > 2.7.3 codebase with that. > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:22 PM Gary D. Gregory <ggreg...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Note that the next BCEL version will be 6.7.0, not 6.6.2 since public > > elements were added since 6.6.1. > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Mukul Gandhi > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@xalan.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@xalan.apache.org
