Joe,

All that information, to whatever level of detail you want, should be in
pom.xml under your entry. IMO.

Gary

On Sat, Jul 1, 2023, 15:33 Joseph Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> As I say, only mild disagreement; if someone wants to aggregate the
> credits I won't object. I still like my thought of doing that by package,
> but if that's too much effort, sigh. (I may also be biased by the fact that
> some things, such as DTM, are largely my fault.)
>
> --
>    /_  Joe Kesselman (he/him/his)
> -/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans:
>    /   https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/
>
> () Plaintext Ribbon Campaign
> /\ Stamp out HTML mail!
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Joseph Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu>
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 1, 2023 5:17:40 AM
> *To:* dev@xalan.apache.org <dev@xalan.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Suggestion: avoid adding @author tag to javadoc
>
> Mild disagreement. I like seeing the reminders of who contributed to what
> parts of the system, and some of that history predates our moving to Git
> (or even the code's contribution to Apache).
>
> I think authors deserve credit.
>
> But I'm biased; I worked directly with many of those people.
>
> I suppose the information could be extracted and summarized into a
> "credits page", if someone wanted to spend the cycles on that.
>
> --
>    /_  Joe Kesselman (he/him/his)
> -/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans:
>    /   https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/
>
> () Plaintext Ribbon Campaign
> /\ Stamp out HTML mail!
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 1, 2023 4:39:39 AM
> *To:* dev@xalan.apache.org <dev@xalan.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Suggestion: avoid adding @author tag to javadoc
>
> Hi,
>
> I suggest to stop adding @author tags.
>
> The relevant information exists in Git, and it is hard to tell when
> @author tags should be added, updated, and removed.
>
> See reasoning in
> https://stackoverflow.com/a/17271433,
> https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/914#issuecomment-328078934
>
> What do you think?
>
> Vladimir
> --
> Vladimir
>

Reply via email to