Joe, All that information, to whatever level of detail you want, should be in pom.xml under your entry. IMO.
Gary On Sat, Jul 1, 2023, 15:33 Joseph Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > As I say, only mild disagreement; if someone wants to aggregate the > credits I won't object. I still like my thought of doing that by package, > but if that's too much effort, sigh. (I may also be biased by the fact that > some things, such as DTM, are largely my fault.) > > -- > /_ Joe Kesselman (he/him/his) > -/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans: > / https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/ > > () Plaintext Ribbon Campaign > /\ Stamp out HTML mail! > ------------------------------ > *From:* Joseph Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> > *Sent:* Saturday, July 1, 2023 5:17:40 AM > *To:* dev@xalan.apache.org <dev@xalan.apache.org> > *Subject:* Re: Suggestion: avoid adding @author tag to javadoc > > Mild disagreement. I like seeing the reminders of who contributed to what > parts of the system, and some of that history predates our moving to Git > (or even the code's contribution to Apache). > > I think authors deserve credit. > > But I'm biased; I worked directly with many of those people. > > I suppose the information could be extracted and summarized into a > "credits page", if someone wanted to spend the cycles on that. > > -- > /_ Joe Kesselman (he/him/his) > -/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans: > / https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/ > > () Plaintext Ribbon Campaign > /\ Stamp out HTML mail! > ------------------------------ > *From:* Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, July 1, 2023 4:39:39 AM > *To:* dev@xalan.apache.org <dev@xalan.apache.org> > *Subject:* Suggestion: avoid adding @author tag to javadoc > > Hi, > > I suggest to stop adding @author tags. > > The relevant information exists in Git, and it is hard to tell when > @author tags should be added, updated, and removed. > > See reasoning in > https://stackoverflow.com/a/17271433, > https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/914#issuecomment-328078934 > > What do you think? > > Vladimir > -- > Vladimir >